Ready-Mode-Rainy
0x563440ab8a9557261a74148f97ad1852849bd81a
Wallet digest
Activity score
75/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
69
Open notional
$44.1K
Total PnL
$-30.0K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 69- UNDER
Parma Calcio 1913 vs. US Sassuolo Calcio: O/U 2.5
11500 shares @ 49.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 24, 2026$11.5K
$5.9K
- UNDER
Manchester City FC vs. Aston Villa FC: O/U 3.5
17417 shares @ 53.4¢·now 54.5¢·exp May 24, 2026$9.5K
$187.09
- AC MILAN
Spread: AC Milan (-1.5)
11071 shares @ 49.0¢·now 49.5¢·exp May 24, 2026$5.5K
$55.36
- UNDER
Crystal Palace FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 2.5
9770 shares @ 48.0¢·now 47.5¢·exp May 24, 2026$4.6K
$-48.85
- OVER
Hellas Verona FC vs. AS Roma: O/U 2.5
8444 shares @ 52.0¢·now 51.5¢·exp May 24, 2026$4.3K
$-42.22
- NO
Will Brighton & Hove Albion FC win on 2026-05-24?
7420 shares @ 49.0¢·now 49.5¢·exp May 24, 2026$3.7K
$37.10
- ASTON VILLA FC
Spread: Manchester City FC (-1.5)
3858 shares @ 45.0¢·now 54.5¢·exp May 24, 2026$2.1K
$366.51
- UNDER
Nottingham Forest FC vs. AFC Bournemouth: O/U 2.5
3650 shares @ 40.8¢·now 42.5¢·exp May 24, 2026$1.6K
$61.25
- NO
Will Chelsea FC win on 2026-05-24?
1500 shares @ 53.0¢·now 53.5¢·exp May 24, 2026$802.50
$7.50
- UNDER
Liverpool FC vs. Brentford FC: O/U 3.5
1000 shares @ 57.0¢·now 52.5¢·exp May 24, 2026$525.00
$-45.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Chelsea FC win on 2026-05-24?$806.21May 24, 14:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Brighton & Hove Albion FC win on 2026-05-24?$3.7KMay 24, 14:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest FC vs. AFC Bournemouth: O/U 2.5$417.26May 24, 14:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest FC vs. AFC Bournemouth: O/U 2.5$417.26May 24, 14:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest FC vs. AFC Bournemouth: O/U 2.5$417.26May 24, 14:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYCrystal Palace FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 2.5$952.55May 24, 13:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYCrystal Palace FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 2.5$1.9KMay 24, 13:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYCrystal Palace FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 2.5$1.9KMay 24, 13:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYManchester City FC vs. Aston Villa FC: O/U 3.5$1.3KMay 24, 12:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: AC Milan (-1.5)$544.35May 24, 12:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: AC Milan (-1.5)$5.0KMay 24, 12:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYLiverpool FC vs. Brentford FC: O/U 3.5$577.35May 24, 12:16 UTC
- TRADEBUYParma Calcio 1913 vs. US Sassuolo Calcio: O/U 2.5$1.2KMay 24, 12:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYParma Calcio 1913 vs. US Sassuolo Calcio: O/U 2.5$4.5KMay 24, 12:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYManchester City FC vs. Aston Villa FC: O/U 3.5$5.5KMay 24, 11:54 UTC
- TRADEBUYManchester City FC vs. Aston Villa FC: O/U 3.5$1.1KMay 24, 11:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYManchester City FC vs. Aston Villa FC: O/U 3.5$1.6KMay 24, 11:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest FC vs. AFC Bournemouth: O/U 2.5$264.68May 24, 11:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Manchester City FC (-1.5)$1.8KMay 24, 11:16 UTC
- TRADEBUYHellas Verona FC vs. AS Roma: O/U 2.5$1.1KMay 24, 11:10 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentLedger volume
$5.4K
Trades
1
Buy share
100%
Window
May 24, 12:00 UTC → May 24, 11:54 UTC
- BUYManchester City FC vs. Aston Villa FC: O/U 3.5$5.4K@54¢May 24, 11:54 UTC
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$5.4K
1 trades
30d volume
$5.4K
1 trades
Buy share
100%
Sample
low
1 ledger trades
Top market concentration
Manchester City FC vs. Aston Villa FC: O/U 3.5
$5.4K · 100% of recorded whale volume
Recorded market concentration
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 43
- Avg trade size
- $1.3K
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 23, 18:35 UTC
- Last active
- May 24, 14:43 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".