Black-Fowl
0xc3060513380afb771018d5f93e413c04a6503865
Wallet digest
Activity score
64/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$32.77
Total PnL
$-5.23
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Amazon (AMZN) close above $275 on May 26?$38.03May 23, 14:21 UTC
- REDEEMWill Meta reach $730 in February?$3.01Mar 28, 11:14 UTC
- REDEEMBNB Up or Down - March 28, 12:00AM-4:00AM ET$1.1KMar 28, 11:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYBNB Up or Down - March 28, 12:00AM-4:00AM ET$210.00Mar 28, 05:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYBNB Up or Down - March 28, 12:00AM-4:00AM ET$358.74Mar 28, 05:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Meta reach $730 in February?$3.00Feb 25, 09:44 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Hyperliquid dip to $16 in February?$1.5KFeb 25, 09:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hyperliquid dip to $16 in February?$1.5KFeb 25, 09:06 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 6
- Avg trade size
- $605.28
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Feb 25, 09:06 UTC
- Last active
- May 23, 14:21 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".