Comparison
Orrery vs Telonex / Marketlens
Orrery is not trying to out-Telonex / Marketlens Telonex / Marketlens. It wins a different job: turning prediction-market movement into source-aware, settlement-aware, agent-readable verification intelligence.
Where Telonex / Marketlens is strong
Tick-level history, order-book snapshots, Parquet/API exports, and backtesting workflows for quant users who need raw market microstructure.
Deep historical order-book and trade datasets
Backtesting and research workflows for technical users
Export-friendly data products
Strong fit for quant teams that want raw history first
Where Orrery differs
Orrery deliberately avoids copy-trading, “AI alpha”, and smart-money claims. The product is built around source quality, derived market state, resolution risk, daily workflow, alerts, and agent-safe JSON.
Orrery does not need to out-store raw history to own the verification layer
Historical support is shown as context, not as a profitable recommendation
Decision Cards can cite movement, source status, and resolution risk before deeper quant analysis
The Orrery dataset should compound around verified observations and outcomes, not only raw rows
Recommended Orrery path
research onlyUse Orrery to decide what deserves verification, then use historical data tools for deeper reconstruction when needed.
Questions this comparison answers
answer engine readyOrrery vs Telonex / Marketlens
alternatives to Telonex / Marketlens
best Polymarket analytics tools
Keyword coverage
competitive queriesOrrery vs Telonex / MarketlensTelonex / Marketlens alternativeprediction market analytics toolsPolymarket analytics toolsprediction market intelligence platform