Knowing-Bowl
0x0050f9e1413aaca39d107231f130b6c7f5ac336c
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
25
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-4.1K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 25- YES
Will Brisbane Roar FC win on 2026-03-21?
2892 shares @ 68.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 21, 2026$0.00
$-2.0K
- UNDER
Racing Club de Lens vs. Angers SCO: O/U 4.5
604 shares @ 79.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 20, 2026$0.00
$-478.88
- UNDER
Brentford FC vs. Wolverhampton Wanderers FC: O/U 3.5
454 shares @ 66.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 16, 2026$0.00
$-299.84
- YES
Will Manchester City win on 2025-08-23?
306 shares @ 65.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Aug 23, 2025$0.00
$-199.00
- UP
Ethereum Up or Down - November 22, 2PM ET
273 shares @ 59.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 22, 2025$0.00
$-161.34
- NO
Will Gemini 3.0 be released on November 18 2025?
247 shares @ 8.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 30, 2025$0.00
$-20.00
- UNDER
Aston Villa FC vs. Liverpool FC: O/U 4.5
226 shares @ 85.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.00
$-191.72
- DRX
League of Legends: Dplus KIA vs. DRX
173 shares @ 57.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Aug 23, 2025$0.00
$-100.00
- NO
Will Arsenal FC win on 2025-11-26?
165 shares @ 60.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 26, 2025$0.00
$-99.81
- NO
Will Trump sign the Epstein Disclosure Bill on November 19?
152 shares @ 66.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 28, 2025$0.00
$-100.00
Recent activity
- TRADESELLParis Saint-Germain FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 1.5$620.91May 30, 19:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYParis Saint-Germain FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 1.5$439.01May 30, 16:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYAston Villa FC vs. Liverpool FC: O/U 4.5$192.58May 15, 15:10 UTC
- REDEEMReal Madrid CF vs. Real Oviedo: O/U 4.5$192.54May 15, 02:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYReal Madrid CF vs. Real Oviedo: O/U 4.5$146.84May 14, 18:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Brisbane Roar FC win on 2026-03-21?$2.0KMar 21, 04:16 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Macarthur FC win on 2026-03-20?$2.0KMar 21, 03:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Macarthur FC win on 2026-03-20?$1.5KMar 21, 03:04 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Auckland FC win on 2026-03-20?$105.01Mar 21, 02:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Auckland FC win on 2026-03-20?$870.10Mar 21, 01:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYRacing Club de Lens vs. Angers SCO: O/U 4.5$478.88Mar 20, 19:45 UTC
- TRADESELLWill SSC Napoli win on 2026-03-20?$478.89Mar 20, 19:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill SSC Napoli win on 2026-03-20?$274.42Mar 20, 16:46 UTC
- TRADESELLLiverpool FC vs. Galatasaray SK: O/U 4.5$790.20Mar 18, 22:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYLiverpool FC vs. Galatasaray SK: O/U 4.5$522.75Mar 18, 21:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Bayern München vs. Atalanta BC: Both Teams to Score$100.00Mar 18, 21:36 UTC
- TRADESELLWill FC Bayern München win on 2026-03-18?$622.76Mar 18, 21:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FC Bayern München win on 2026-03-18?$442.60Mar 18, 19:28 UTC
- TRADESELLWill FC Barcelona win on 2026-03-18?$442.60Mar 18, 19:14 UTC
- REDEEMLeague of Legends: Bilibili Gaming vs. Invictus Gaming$0.00Mar 18, 17:17 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 46
- Avg trade size
- $638.70
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Nov 24, 21:45 UTC
- Last active
- May 30, 19:25 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".