Acclaimed-Deliberation
0x021ad1e9cee953992811c393aa2204d3917456cb
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
48
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-41.9K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 48- OVER
Brighton & Hove Albion FC vs. Sunderland AFC: O/U 1.5
25310 shares @ 22.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 20, 2025$0.00
$-5.8K
- YES
Will 1. FC Köln win on 2025-12-20?
22320 shares @ 30.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 20, 2025$0.00
$-6.7K
- OVER
1. FC Köln vs. 1. FC Union Berlin: O/U 1.5
16629 shares @ 53.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 20, 2025$0.00
$-8.9K
- OVER
Real Oviedo vs. RC Celta de Vigo: O/U 1.5
8013 shares @ 43.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 20, 2025$0.00
$-3.5K
- MIX
Mix vs. Wiklacz
7953 shares @ 75.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 11, 2025$0.00
$-6.0K
- OVER
Valencia CF vs. RCD Mallorca: O/U 2.5
5395 shares @ 57.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 19, 2025$0.00
$-3.1K
- DUBOIS
Boxing: Usyk vs Dubois 2
3087 shares @ 23.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 20, 2025$0.00
$-710.00
- OVER
1. FC Köln vs. 1. FC Union Berlin: O/U 2.5
2886 shares @ 24.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 20, 2025$0.00
$-700.85
- YES
Will the price of Ethereum be between $4100 and $4200 on August 15?
2013 shares @ 5.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Aug 15, 2025$0.00
$-100.00
- YES
Will Ethereum dip to $2200 in July?
1775 shares @ 11.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Aug 1, 2025$0.00
$-200.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYBrighton & Hove Albion FC vs. Sunderland AFC: O/U 1.5$1.0KDec 20, 16:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYBrighton & Hove Albion FC vs. Sunderland AFC: O/U 1.5$1.0KDec 20, 16:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYBrighton & Hove Albion FC vs. Sunderland AFC: O/U 1.5$1000.00Dec 20, 16:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYBrighton & Hove Albion FC vs. Sunderland AFC: O/U 1.5$1.0KDec 20, 16:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYBrighton & Hove Albion FC vs. Sunderland AFC: O/U 1.5$865.33Dec 20, 16:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYBrighton & Hove Albion FC vs. Sunderland AFC: O/U 1.5$943.93Dec 20, 16:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill 1. FC Köln win on 2025-12-20?$439.52Dec 20, 15:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill 1. FC Köln win on 2025-12-20?$6.3KDec 20, 15:49 UTC
- TRADEBUY1. FC Köln vs. 1. FC Union Berlin: O/U 2.5$700.85Dec 20, 14:57 UTC
- TRADEBUY1. FC Köln vs. 1. FC Union Berlin: O/U 1.5$1000.00Dec 20, 14:56 UTC
- TRADEBUY1. FC Köln vs. 1. FC Union Berlin: O/U 1.5$1000.00Dec 20, 14:56 UTC
- TRADEBUY1. FC Köln vs. 1. FC Union Berlin: O/U 1.5$808.70Dec 20, 14:56 UTC
- TRADEBUY1. FC Köln vs. 1. FC Union Berlin: O/U 1.5$1000.00Dec 20, 14:56 UTC
- TRADEBUY1. FC Köln vs. 1. FC Union Berlin: O/U 1.5$1000.00Dec 20, 14:56 UTC
- TRADEBUY1. FC Köln vs. 1. FC Union Berlin: O/U 1.5$509.16Dec 20, 14:56 UTC
- TRADEBUY1. FC Köln vs. 1. FC Union Berlin: O/U 1.5$2.0KDec 20, 14:55 UTC
- TRADEBUY1. FC Köln vs. 1. FC Union Berlin: O/U 1.5$1.6KDec 20, 14:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Real Oviedo win on 2025-12-20?$200.00Dec 20, 14:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill RC Celta de Vigo win on 2025-12-20?$200.00Dec 20, 14:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYReal Oviedo vs. RC Celta de Vigo: O/U 1.5$3.0KDec 20, 13:34 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 50
- Avg trade size
- $776.20
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Dec 14, 17:54 UTC
- Last active
- Dec 20, 16:31 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".