Frigid-Underwriting
0x0375f1d6fbc05975ab68b418cbfa1acb08ab3862
Wallet digest
Activity score
70/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$11.91
Total PnL
$1.91
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- REDEEMWill ConstitutionDAO win the Sotheby’s auction for the United States Constitution?$0.00Dec 17, 22:38 UTC
- REDEEMWill the 7-day COVID-19 case average on November 17th be higher than it was a week earlier?$5.40Dec 17, 22:38 UTC
- REDEEMWill a picture surface of Kim Kardashian and Pete Davidson kissing before November 30th, 2021?$8.82Dec 17, 22:37 UTC
- REDEEMWill Bitcoin ($BTC) price reach $70,000 before November 15, 2021?$5.61Nov 18, 22:32 UTC
- REDEEMWill Joe Biden's approval rating be 43.0% or higher at the end of November 13?$5.73Nov 18, 22:32 UTC
- REDEEMWill Ethereum reach $5000 by November 17th?$0.00Nov 18, 22:32 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 0
- Avg trade size
- $0.00
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Nov 18, 22:32 UTC
- Last active
- Dec 17, 22:38 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".