Hollow-Opponent
0x04deca2a5a616f1fc26f58461198e0e141ea1b8d
Activity score
75/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$18.39
Total PnL
$-0.46
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill SC Preußen Münster win on 2026-05-03?$18.901d ago
- REDEEMWill Burnley FC win on 2026-04-22?$17.269d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Burnley FC win on 2026-04-22?$16.599d ago
- REDEEMWill Olympique Lyonnais win on 2026-04-19?$0.0011d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Olympique Lyonnais win on 2026-04-19?$17.5414d ago
- REDEEMWill FC Internazionale Milano vs. Cagliari Calcio end in a draw?$18.0414d ago
- TRADEBUYWill FC Internazionale Milano vs. Cagliari Calcio end in a draw?$15.2314d ago
- REDEEMWill Damac Saudi Club win on 2026-04-09?$15.5322d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Damac Saudi Club win on 2026-04-09?$13.8223d ago
- REWARD$2.7526d ago
- REWARD$0.1026d ago
- REWARD$0.3727d ago
- REDEEMWill Ethena reach $0.28 in March?$13.7830d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Ethena reach $0.28 in March?$13.7732d ago
- REDEEMPacers vs. Magic$0.0034d ago
- REDEEMGrizzlies vs. Hawks$0.0034d ago
- REDEEMWill Hellas Verona FC win on 2026-03-22?$11.4940d ago
- REDEEMWill Hamburger SV win on 2026-03-21?$21.6341d ago
- TRADEBUYGrizzlies vs. Hawks$1.1641d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Hellas Verona FC win on 2026-03-22?$10.3641d ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 24
- Avg trade size
- $18.65
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 59d ago
- Last active
- 1d ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".