Slushy-Hydrolyse
0x062550964adf5ae17ab08ebcb00ebef0ce5dd834
Wallet digest
Activity score
73/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
3
Open notional
$39.16
Total PnL
$0.56
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- NO
Will the Government shutdown end November 8-11?
21 shares @ 99.3¢·now 100.0¢·exp Nov 15, 2025$20.75
$0.15
- NO
Will XRP reach $3.10 November 10-16?
12 shares @ 99.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Nov 17, 2025$12.12
$0.12
- NO
Will José Antonio Kast win the 1st round of the 2025 Chilean presidential election?
6 shares @ 95.3¢·now 100.0¢·exp Nov 16, 2025$6.30
$0.30
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill XRP reach $3.10 November 10-16?$12.00Nov 11, 17:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the Government shutdown end November 8-11?$20.60Nov 11, 10:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill José Antonio Kast win the 1st round of the 2025 Chilean presidential election?$6.00Nov 6, 21:48 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 3
- Avg trade size
- $12.87
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Nov 6, 21:48 UTC
- Last active
- Nov 11, 17:00 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".