Motherly-Crusader
0x0644bbf4db38945a5f788838476cc2457c4cc7b4
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
76
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-3.7K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 76- OVER
Le Havre AC vs. Olympique Lyonnais: O/U 1.5
911 shares @ 32.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 15, 2026$0.00
$-300.00
- OVER
SS Lazio vs. AC Milan: O/U 2.5
812 shares @ 49.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 15, 2026$0.00
$-400.00
- OVER
Liverpool FC vs. Tottenham Hotspur FC: O/U 2.5
513 shares @ 39.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 15, 2026$0.00
$-200.00
- OVER
Real Betis Balompié vs. RC Celta de Vigo: O/U 2.5
501 shares @ 49.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 15, 2026$0.00
$-247.00
- OVER
VfB Stuttgart vs. RB Leipzig: O/U 1.5
493 shares @ 61.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 15, 2026$0.00
$-300.81
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - March 2, 10:40PM-10:45PM ET
453 shares @ 21.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 3, 2026$0.00
$-99.27
- OVER
Crystal Palace FC vs. Leeds United FC: O/U 1.5
415 shares @ 41.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 15, 2026$0.00
$-170.00
- YES
Will Crystal Palace FC win on 2026-03-15?
406 shares @ 37.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 15, 2026$0.00
$-150.00
- OVER
Le Havre AC vs. Olympique Lyonnais: O/U 2.5
333 shares @ 30.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 15, 2026$0.00
$-100.00
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - March 15, 10:55AM-11:00AM ET
333 shares @ 3.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 15, 2026$0.00
$-10.00
Recent activity
- REDEEMLiverpool FC vs. Tottenham Hotspur FC: O/U 1.5$0.25Mar 15, 21:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYSS Lazio vs. AC Milan: O/U 1.5$189.61Mar 15, 21:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill AC Milan win on 2026-03-15?$35.00Mar 15, 20:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - March 15, 4:40PM-4:45PM ET$100.00Mar 15, 20:39 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - March 15, 4:35PM-4:40PM ET$10.00Mar 15, 20:37 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - March 15, 4:35PM-4:40PM ET$50.00Mar 15, 20:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYSS Lazio vs. AC Milan: O/U 2.5$400.00Mar 15, 20:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYVfB Stuttgart vs. RB Leipzig: O/U 1.5$300.81Mar 15, 19:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYReal Betis Balompié vs. RC Celta de Vigo: O/U 2.5$47.00Mar 15, 19:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYReal Betis Balompié vs. RC Celta de Vigo: O/U 2.5$200.00Mar 15, 18:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYComo 1907 vs. AS Roma: O/U 3.5$35.00Mar 15, 18:46 UTC
- TRADESELLComo 1907 vs. AS Roma: O/U 2.5$582.63Mar 15, 18:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYComo 1907 vs. AS Roma: O/U 2.5$13.00Mar 15, 18:39 UTC
- TRADEBUYComo 1907 vs. AS Roma: O/U 2.5$300.00Mar 15, 18:35 UTC
- TRADESELLLiverpool FC vs. Tottenham Hotspur FC: O/U 1.5$312.69Mar 15, 18:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYLiverpool FC vs. Tottenham Hotspur FC: O/U 1.5$173.00Mar 15, 18:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Olympique Lyonnais win on 2026-03-15?$0.01Mar 15, 17:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYLiverpool FC vs. Tottenham Hotspur FC: O/U 2.5$200.00Mar 15, 17:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYLe Havre AC vs. Olympique Lyonnais: O/U 1.5$50.00Mar 15, 17:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYLe Havre AC vs. Olympique Lyonnais: O/U 1.5$50.00Mar 15, 17:41 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 41
- Avg trade size
- $121.89
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Mar 2, 19:18 UTC
- Last active
- Mar 15, 21:43 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".