Trusty-Rosemary
0x066e8bd6eff5e2db9636321b200c90cb8a3f3494
Wallet digest
Activity score
65/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
23
Open notional
$32.29
Total PnL
$-43.58
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 23- NO
Will FC Bayern München win on 2026-05-23?
14040 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.1¢·exp May 23, 2026$7.02
$-7.02
- CA OSASUNA
Spread: Getafe CF (-1.5)
6 shares @ 89.9¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$5.56
$0.56
- UNDER
Deportivo Alavés vs. Rayo Vallecano de Madrid: O/U 2.5
7000 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.1¢·exp May 23, 2026$3.50
$-3.50
- NO
Will New York Red Bulls win on 2026-05-23?
6 shares @ 54.0¢·now 54.5¢·exp May 24, 2026$3.03
$0.03
- NO
Will Brighton & Hove Albion FC win on 2026-05-24?
4 shares @ 46.0¢·now 45.5¢·exp May 24, 2026$1.98
$-0.02
- CHICAGO CUBS
Spread: Chicago Cubs (-1.5)
3370 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.1¢·exp May 23, 2026$1.69
$-1.69
- UNDER
Getafe CF vs. CA Osasuna: O/U 0.5
2772 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.1¢·exp May 23, 2026$1.39
$-1.79
- UNDER
FC Bayern München vs. VfB Stuttgart: O/U 1.5
2720 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.1¢·exp May 23, 2026$1.36
$-1.36
- VFB STUTTGART
Spread: FC Bayern München (-2.5)
2410 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.1¢·exp May 23, 2026$1.21
$-1.21
- NO
Will RCD Mallorca win on 2026-05-23?
2000 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.1¢·exp May 23, 2026$1.00
$-1.00
Recent activity
- REDEEMWill Wydad Athletic Club win on 2026-05-23?$0.00May 23, 22:11 UTC
- REDEEMWill Real Madrid CF win on 2026-05-23?$0.00May 23, 21:49 UTC
- REDEEMWill FC Universitatea Cluj vs. Dinamo 1948 end in a draw?$0.00May 23, 21:49 UTC
- REDEEMReal Madrid CF leading at halftime?$0.00May 23, 21:49 UTC
- REDEEMDeportivo Alavés leading at halftime?$0.00May 23, 21:49 UTC
- REDEEMWill FC Universitatea Cluj win on 2026-05-23?$0.00May 23, 21:49 UTC
- REDEEMMinnesota Lynx vs. Chicago Sky$0.00May 23, 21:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Real Madrid CF (-1.5)$1.03May 23, 21:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Brighton & Hove Albion FC win on 2026-05-24?$1.02May 23, 21:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYDeportivo Alavés vs. Rayo Vallecano de Madrid: O/U 1.5$1.03May 23, 21:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYDeportivo Alavés vs. Rayo Vallecano de Madrid: O/U 2.5$1.03May 23, 21:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYDeportivo Alavés vs. Rayo Vallecano de Madrid: O/U 2.5$1.03May 23, 21:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYValencia CF vs. FC Barcelona: O/U 3.5$1.03May 23, 21:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Bayern München vs. VfB Stuttgart: O/U 2.5$1.03May 23, 21:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill RC Celta de Vigo win on 2026-05-23?$1.03May 23, 21:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYDeportivo Alavés vs. Rayo Vallecano de Madrid: O/U 2.5$1.03May 23, 21:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYDeportivo Alavés vs. Rayo Vallecano de Madrid: O/U 2.5$1.03May 23, 21:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYSS Lazio vs. Pisa SC: O/U 2.5$1.03May 23, 21:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYDeportivo Alavés vs. Rayo Vallecano de Madrid: Both Teams to Score$1.03May 23, 21:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYDeportivo Alavés vs. Rayo Vallecano de Madrid: O/U 2.5$1.03May 23, 21:06 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 43
- Avg trade size
- $1.09
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 23, 20:44 UTC
- Last active
- May 23, 22:11 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".