Well-Informed-Knitting
0x07921379f7b31ef93da634b688b2fe36897db778
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
49
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-2.0M
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 49- YES
Will Olympique de Marseille win on 2026-04-26?
641441 shares @ 55.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 26, 2026$0.00
$-352.9K
- NO
Will Lille OSC win on 2026-02-22?
610000 shares @ 46.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 22, 2026$0.00
$-280.6K
- OVER
Sporting CP vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 2.5
296719 shares @ 51.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 7, 2026$0.00
$-151.2K
- NO
Will FC Bayern München win on 2026-04-07?
247721 shares @ 58.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 7, 2026$0.00
$-143.7K
- UNDER
San Diego FC vs. Real Salt Lake: O/U 3.5
201697 shares @ 61.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 22, 2026$0.00
$-123.0K
- OVER
Olympique Lyonnais vs. Paris FC: O/U 2.5
150000 shares @ 45.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 8, 2026$0.00
$-67.5K
- OVER
FC Barcelona vs. Club Atlético de Madrid: O/U 3.5
145620 shares @ 50.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 8, 2026$0.00
$-73.3K
- OVER
Stade Rennais FC 1901 vs. Toulouse FC: O/U 2.5
136658 shares @ 53.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 28, 2026$0.00
$-73.5K
- YES
Will Associação Chapecoense de Futebol win on 2026-03-22?
128027 shares @ 11.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 22, 2026$0.00
$-14.1K
- NO
Will Real Madrid CF win on 2026-03-07?
106073 shares @ 58.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 6, 2026$0.00
$-61.5K
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Córdoba CF win on 2026-05-31?$2.2KMay 31, 17:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Córdoba CF win on 2026-05-31?$1.7KMay 31, 17:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Córdoba CF win on 2026-05-31?$2.1KMay 31, 17:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Córdoba CF win on 2026-05-31?$256.32May 31, 17:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Córdoba CF win on 2026-05-31?$1.9KMay 31, 17:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Córdoba CF win on 2026-05-31?$2.5KMay 31, 17:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Córdoba CF win on 2026-05-31?$1.4KMay 31, 17:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Córdoba CF win on 2026-05-31?$635.59May 31, 11:52 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Córdoba CF win on 2026-05-31?$2.1KMay 31, 11:48 UTC
- REDEEMWill Wolfsburg win on 2026-05-25?$6.8KMay 25, 22:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Wolfsburg win on 2026-05-25?$3.8KMay 25, 17:28 UTC
- REDEEMWill RC Celta de Vigo win on 2026-05-23?$272.3KMay 23, 22:53 UTC
- REDEEMWill RCD Espanyol de Barcelona win on 2026-05-23?$184.2KMay 23, 22:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill RC Celta de Vigo win on 2026-05-23?$19.3KMay 23, 18:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill RC Celta de Vigo win on 2026-05-23?$22.2KMay 23, 18:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill RC Celta de Vigo win on 2026-05-23?$4.3KMay 23, 18:16 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill RC Celta de Vigo win on 2026-05-23?$15.8KMay 23, 18:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill RC Celta de Vigo win on 2026-05-23?$79.2KMay 23, 18:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill RCD Espanyol de Barcelona win on 2026-05-23?$7.1KMay 23, 17:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill RCD Espanyol de Barcelona win on 2026-05-23?$22.3KMay 23, 17:53 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentLedger volume
$39.3K
Trades
2
Buy share
100%
Window
May 23, 13:20 UTC → May 23, 17:50 UTC
- BUYWill RCD Espanyol de Barcelona win on 2026-05-23?$11.7K@55¢May 23, 17:50 UTC
- BUYWill Middlesbrough FC win on 2026-05-23?$27.5K@50¢May 23, 13:18 UTC
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$39.3K
2 trades
Buy share
100%
Sample
low
2 ledger trades
Top market concentration
Will Middlesbrough FC win on 2026-05-23?
$27.5K · 70% of recorded whale volume
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 44
- Avg trade size
- $8.9K
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 17, 18:05 UTC
- Last active
- May 31, 17:47 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".