Imaginary-Thongs
0x0844b9c4b7f3b025d02d6ca614c8a0892e88bf81
Activity score
69/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
39
Open notional
$84.37
Total PnL
$-2.1K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 39- RAMBOOT CLUB
Valorant: Ramboot Club vs KPI Gaming - Map 2 Winner
59 shares @ 63.0¢·now 77.0¢·exp May 4, 2026$45.52
$8.26
- GENTLE MATES GC
Valorant: Gentle Mates GC vs G2 Gozen (BO3) - VCT Game Changers EMEA Group Stage
131 shares @ 58.0¢·now 29.0¢·exp May 4, 2026$38.00
$-38.00
- ZARAZUA
Set Handicap: Zarazua (-1.5) vs Urgesi (+1.5)
70 shares @ 56.0¢·now 1.1¢·exp May 11, 2026$0.73
$-38.41
- EMILIANA ARANGO
Internazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Emiliana Arango vs Noemi Basiletti
119 shares @ 46.6¢·now 0.1¢·exp May 11, 2026$0.06
$-55.40
- KT ROLSTER
LoL: KT Rolster vs BNK FEARX (BO3) - Esports World Cup Korea Qualifier Playoffs
116 shares @ 41.8¢·now 0.1¢·exp May 4, 2026$0.06
$-48.44
- LEVIATÁN ESPORTS
Valorant: Leviatán Esports vs MIBR (BO3) - VCT Americas Stage 1 Group Alpha
325 shares @ 43.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 2, 2026$0.00
$-140.00
- PEDRO MARTINEZ
Internazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Pedro Martinez vs Jesper de Jong
256 shares @ 32.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 11, 2026$0.00
$-82.71
- G2
Map Handicap: G2 (-1.5) vs FaZe (+1.5)
250 shares @ 47.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 2, 2026$0.00
$-117.42
- WILDCARD
Counter-Strike: Voca vs Wildcard - Map 2 Winner
250 shares @ 64.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 4, 2026$0.00
$-159.79
- WILDCARD
Map Handicap: WC (-1.5) vs Voca (+1.5)
184 shares @ 53.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 4, 2026$0.00
$-97.43
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYValorant: Ramboot Club vs KPI Gaming - Map 2 Winner$37.6726m ago
- TRADEBUYSet Handicap: Zarazua (-1.5) vs Urgesi (+1.5)$39.6656m ago
- TRADESELLFrancavilla: Alejandro Moro Canas vs Nishesh Basavareddy$1.6959m ago
- TRADEBUYValorant: Gentle Mates GC vs G2 Gozen (BO3) - VCT Game Changers EMEA Group Stage$76.961h ago
- TRADESELLSet Handicap: Landaluce (-1.5) vs O'Connell (+1.5)$59.961h ago
- TRADESELLInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Nicolai Budkov Kjaer vs Otto Virtanen$92.631h ago
- TRADEBUYFrancavilla: Alejandro Moro Canas vs Nishesh Basavareddy$29.382h ago
- TRADEBUYInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Nicolai Budkov Kjaer vs Otto Virtanen$24.652h ago
- TRADEBUYInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Emiliana Arango vs Noemi Basiletti$56.352h ago
- TRADESELLGame Handicap: T1 (-1.5) vs HANJIN BRION (+1.5)$110.372h ago
- TRADEBUYSet Handicap: Landaluce (-1.5) vs O'Connell (+1.5)$29.533h ago
- TRADESELLCounter-Strike: INFURITY Gaming vs BIG Academy - Map 2 Winner$29.593h ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: INFURITY Gaming vs BIG Academy - Map 2 Winner$19.163h ago
- TRADEBUYGame Handicap: T1 (-1.5) vs HANJIN BRION (+1.5)$66.754h ago
- TRADESELLInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Stefano Travaglia vs Stan Wawrinka$85.804h ago
- TRADEBUYValorant: All Gamers vs EDward Gaming - Map 2 Winner$49.214h ago
- TRADEBUYInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Stefano Travaglia vs Stan Wawrinka$41.874h ago
- TRADESELLInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Leandro Riedi vs Vilius Gaubas$91.094h ago
- TRADEBUYInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Leandro Riedi vs Vilius Gaubas$49.015h ago
- TRADEBUYLoL: KT Rolster vs BNK FEARX (BO3) - Esports World Cup Korea Qualifier Playoffs$49.355h ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 48
- Avg trade size
- $71.79
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 1d ago
- Last active
- 26m ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".