Vicious-Min
0x096380c609b49b228fa53bcf8e8e06a9ebe04e64
Wallet digest
Activity score
90/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
10
Open notional
$379.84
Total PnL
$-0.72
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- NO
Will Bitcoin reach $75,000 on March 31?
371 shares @ 99.9¢·now 100.0¢·exp Apr 1, 2026$370.97
$0.37
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - March 18, 11:20PM-11:25PM ET
3 shares @ 76.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Mar 19, 2026$2.61
$0.63
- NO
Will Real Madrid win the 2025–26 La Liga?
2 shares @ 64.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 30, 2026$1.56
$0.56
- NO
Will Nikola Jokic win the 2025–2026 NBA MVP?
1 shares @ 75.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Jun 10, 2026$1.33
$0.33
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - March 18, 11:05PM-11:10PM ET
1 shares @ 83.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Mar 19, 2026$1.20
$0.20
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - March 18, 11:00PM-11:05PM ET
1 shares @ 88.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Mar 19, 2026$1.13
$0.14
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - March 18, 11:15PM-11:20PM ET
1 shares @ 97.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Mar 19, 2026$1.03
$0.03
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - March 18, 11:10PM-11:15PM ET
2 shares @ 57.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 19, 2026$0.00
$-0.98
- THUNDER
Thunder vs. Timberwolves
1 shares @ 67.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 30, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- NO
Kristi Noem out by March 31?
1 shares @ 78.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 31, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin reach $75,000 on March 31?$370.63Mar 31, 13:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - March 18, 11:20PM-11:25PM ET$2.00Mar 19, 03:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - March 18, 11:15PM-11:20PM ET$1.00Mar 19, 03:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - March 18, 11:10PM-11:15PM ET$1.00Mar 19, 03:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - March 18, 11:05PM-11:10PM ET$1.00Mar 19, 03:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - March 18, 11:00PM-11:05PM ET$1.00Mar 19, 03:03 UTC
- REDEEMWill Chelsea win the 2025–26 Champions League?$1.04Mar 19, 02:59 UTC
- REDEEMWill the price of Bitcoin be less than $62,000 on March 18?$155.00Mar 19, 02:59 UTC
- REDEEMWill Bitcoin reach $80,000 on March 17?$221.00Mar 19, 02:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin reach $80,000 on March 17?$220.78Mar 17, 22:28 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Bitcoin reach $88,000 March 16-22?$221.03Mar 17, 05:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the price of Bitcoin be less than $62,000 on March 18?$154.84Mar 17, 05:39 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Bitcoin reach $88,000 March 16-22?$10.00Mar 17, 05:37 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Bitcoin reach $88,000 March 16-22?$10.00Mar 17, 05:25 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Bitcoin reach $88,000 March 16-22?$11.00Mar 17, 05:24 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Bitcoin reach $88,000 March 16-22?$11.00Mar 17, 05:17 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Bitcoin reach $88,000 March 16-22?$11.00Mar 17, 05:17 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Bitcoin reach $88,000 March 16-22?$99.30Mar 17, 04:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin reach $88,000 March 16-22?$372.99Mar 17, 04:02 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Bitcoin reach $84,000 March 9-15?$374.62Mar 14, 00:53 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 45
- Avg trade size
- $149.17
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Feb 13, 09:16 UTC
- Last active
- Mar 31, 13:30 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".