0x09a2ddfa4d09b68a665d3f14192ed951b48097a5
0x09a2ddfa4d09b68a665d3f14192ed951b48097a5
Wallet digest
Activity score
71/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
3
Open notional
$2.02
Total PnL
$0.52
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - December 16, 10:15AM-10:30AM ET
2 shares @ 51.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Dec 16, 2025$2.02
$0.99
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - December 17, 9:45AM-10:00AM ET
1 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 17, 2025$0.00
$-0.01
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - December 16, 3:30PM-3:45PM ET
1 shares @ 41.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 16, 2025$0.00
$-0.46
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - December 17, 9:45AM-10:00AM ET$0.01Dec 17, 14:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - December 16, 3:30PM-3:45PM ET$0.46Dec 16, 20:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - December 16, 10:15AM-10:30AM ET$1.03Dec 16, 15:14 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 3
- Avg trade size
- $0.50
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Dec 16, 15:14 UTC
- Last active
- Dec 17, 14:53 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".