Used-Gear
0x0a5632e6eabde3be4987a913667f86b6415e6a0d
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
6
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-4.7K
Realised
$-630.57
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- DOWN
Ethereum Up or Down - December 3, 1:15AM-1:30AM ET
12164 shares @ 23.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 3, 2025$0.00
$-2.9K
- DOWN
Ethereum Up or Down - December 3, 1:00AM-1:15AM ET
6100 shares @ 1.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 3, 2025$0.00
$-70.98
- UP
Ethereum Up or Down - December 3, 1:30AM-1:45AM ET
3300 shares @ 35.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 3, 2025$0.00
$-1.2K
- YES
Will Elon Musk post 160-179 tweets from December 2 to December 9, 2025?
500 shares @ 3.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 9, 2025$0.00
$-15.00
- YES
Will Elon Musk post 120-139 tweets from December 2 to December 9, 2025?
235 shares @ 0.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 9, 2025$0.00
$-2.11
- YES
Will Elon Musk post 140-159 tweets from December 2 to December 9, 2025?
180 shares @ 1.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 9, 2025$0.00
$-3.24
Recent activity
- TRADESELLWill Elon Musk post 260-279 tweets from December 2 to December 9, 2025?$259.12Dec 4, 10:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon Musk post 160-179 tweets from December 2 to December 9, 2025?$15.00Dec 3, 15:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon Musk post 140-159 tweets from December 2 to December 9, 2025?$1.09Dec 3, 13:37 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon Musk post 140-159 tweets from December 2 to December 9, 2025?$0.02Dec 3, 13:37 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon Musk post 140-159 tweets from December 2 to December 9, 2025?$1.62Dec 3, 13:37 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon Musk post 120-139 tweets from December 2 to December 9, 2025?$0.68Dec 3, 13:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon Musk post 120-139 tweets from December 2 to December 9, 2025?$0.81Dec 3, 13:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon Musk post 120-139 tweets from December 2 to December 9, 2025?$0.27Dec 3, 07:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon Musk post 120-139 tweets from December 2 to December 9, 2025?$0.01Dec 3, 07:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon Musk post 120-139 tweets from December 2 to December 9, 2025?$0.01Dec 3, 07:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - December 3, 1:30AM-1:45AM ET$7.00Dec 3, 06:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - December 3, 1:30AM-1:45AM ET$2.45Dec 3, 06:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - December 3, 1:30AM-1:45AM ET$18.61Dec 3, 06:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - December 3, 1:30AM-1:45AM ET$28.35Dec 3, 06:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - December 3, 1:30AM-1:45AM ET$14.00Dec 3, 06:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - December 3, 1:30AM-1:45AM ET$22.90Dec 3, 06:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - December 3, 1:30AM-1:45AM ET$19.70Dec 3, 06:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - December 3, 1:30AM-1:45AM ET$3.50Dec 3, 06:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - December 3, 1:30AM-1:45AM ET$28.35Dec 3, 06:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - December 3, 1:30AM-1:45AM ET$24.88Dec 3, 06:32 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 50
- Avg trade size
- $14.57
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Dec 3, 06:32 UTC
- Last active
- Dec 4, 10:53 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".