Fine-Room
0x0a94dee1b77fc3f9c6d10d51fbdc68975789d11f
Wallet digest
Activity score
41/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
3
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-102.00
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- YES
Will DeepSeek’s DeepSeek V3.1 Chat win the NOF1.ai competition?
1701 shares @ 5.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 24, 2025$0.00
$-100.00
- YES
Will DeepSeek’s DeepSeek V3.1 Chat lose the NOF1.ai competition?
1000 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 3, 2025$0.00
$-1.00
- YES
Will Alibaba’s Qwen 3 Max lose the NOF1.ai competition?
500 shares @ 0.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 3, 2025$0.00
$-1.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Alibaba’s Qwen 3 Max lose the NOF1.ai competition?$1.00Nov 3, 17:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill DeepSeek’s DeepSeek V3.1 Chat lose the NOF1.ai competition?$1.00Nov 3, 17:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill DeepSeek’s DeepSeek V3.1 Chat win the NOF1.ai competition?$100.00Nov 3, 17:23 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 3
- Avg trade size
- $34.00
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Nov 3, 17:23 UTC
- Last active
- Nov 3, 17:35 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".