Pointed-Hippodrome
0x0c3d8f1e50210165a1fe186ef45c540fcff7f757
Wallet digest
Activity score
93/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
20
Open notional
$8.4K
Total PnL
$-468.53
Realised
$218.24
Win rate
67%
3 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 20- OVER
KKS Lech Poznań vs. Aarhus GF: O/U 1.5
3637 shares @ 95.1¢·now 99.6¢·exp Jul 29, 2026$3.6K
$163.88
- OVER
Universitatea Craiova CS vs. PFK Levski Sofia: O/U 3.5
2497 shares @ 98.4¢·now 100.0¢·exp Jul 29, 2026$2.5K
$38.60
- NO
Predict.fun FDV above $500M one day after launch?
833 shares @ 68.0¢·now 47.5¢·exp Jan 1, 2028$395.69
$-170.77
- YES
Will Mohamed Salah play in Süper Lig next?
1959 shares @ 48.4¢·now 19.5¢·exp Sep 1, 2026$381.98
$-567.15
- OVER
Universitatea Craiova CS vs. PFK Levski Sofia: O/U 1.5
286 shares @ 99.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Jul 29, 2026$286.17
$2.72
- YES
Will Kawhi play for the Toronto Raptors in 2026-27?
311 shares @ 96.3¢·now 81.7¢·exp Oct 31, 2026$254.26
$-45.74
- YES
Górnik Zabrze vs. Fenerbahçe SK: Both Teams to Score
232 shares @ 99.0¢·now 99.6¢·exp Jul 29, 2026$230.69
$1.27
- YES
Will Benfica qualify for the League Phase of the 2026-27 UEFA Europa League?
250 shares @ 97.9¢·now 88.0¢·exp Jun 1, 2026$220.03
$-24.86
- NO
Predict.fun FDV above $200M one day after launch?
841 shares @ 34.0¢·now 20.5¢·exp Jan 1, 2028$172.42
$-113.55
- OVER
FC København vs. FK Polissia: 1st Half O/U 0.5
122 shares @ 99.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Jul 29, 2026$121.80
$1.16
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYŠK Slovan Bratislava vs. SK Iberia 1999: O/U 1.5$98.00Jul 29, 19:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYGórnik Zabrze vs. Fenerbahçe SK: Both Teams to Score$7.70Jul 29, 18:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYGórnik Zabrze vs. Fenerbahçe SK: Both Teams to Score$221.71Jul 29, 18:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYUniversitatea Craiova CS vs. PFK Levski Sofia: O/U 3.5$894.56Jul 29, 18:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYUniversitatea Craiova CS vs. PFK Levski Sofia: O/U 3.5$1.6KJul 29, 18:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYKKS Lech Poznań vs. Aarhus GF: O/U 2.5$6.25Jul 29, 18:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYKKS Lech Poznań vs. Aarhus GF: O/U 2.5$16.49Jul 29, 18:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYKKS Lech Poznań vs. Aarhus GF: O/U 2.5$3.24Jul 29, 18:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC København vs. FK Polissia: 1st Half O/U 0.5$120.64Jul 29, 18:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYKKS Lech Poznań vs. Aarhus GF: O/U 1.5$5.62Jul 29, 18:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYKKS Lech Poznań vs. Aarhus GF: O/U 1.5$207.90Jul 29, 18:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYKKS Lech Poznań vs. Aarhus GF: O/U 1.5$5.42Jul 29, 18:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYKKS Lech Poznań vs. Aarhus GF: O/U 1.5$9.90Jul 29, 18:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYKKS Lech Poznań vs. Aarhus GF: O/U 1.5$6.65Jul 29, 18:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYKKS Lech Poznań vs. Aarhus GF: O/U 1.5$9.50Jul 29, 18:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYKKS Lech Poznań vs. Aarhus GF: O/U 1.5$190.00Jul 29, 18:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYKKS Lech Poznań vs. Aarhus GF: O/U 1.5$16.15Jul 29, 18:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYKKS Lech Poznań vs. Aarhus GF: O/U 1.5$25.33Jul 29, 18:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYKKS Lech Poznań vs. Aarhus GF: O/U 1.5$19.00Jul 29, 18:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYKKS Lech Poznań vs. Aarhus GF: O/U 1.5$19.76Jul 29, 18:13 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentLedger volume
$79.3K
Trades
1
Buy share
8%
Window
May 16, 23:00 UTC → Jun 17, 21:13 UTC
- BUYWill Australia win Eurovision 2026?$6.0K@99¢May 16, 22:58 UTC
Wallet edge sanity
Do not mirror
13/100Treat this wallet as noise/context only until resolved history, copy-risk, and liquidity checks improve.
Closed-market sample is still too small to treat the win rate as durable.
Large size, concentration, or thin history makes this wallet unsafe to imitate.
Many positions were entered near obvious prices, which can inflate win rate while hiding tail risk.
Required before treating wallet flow as useful
67% win rate over 3 closed markets.
A wallet trade is not useful unless a later follower could still enter after spread, slippage, and latency.
Large positions need enough depth to exit; mark-to-market PnL is not cash.
The trade still needs source, expiry, dispute, and settlement checks at the market level.
Leaderboards surface visible winners; losing or abandoned wallets disappear from attention.
Wallet intelligence filter
Watch only
0/100Wallet flow is useful for attention, but missing/review stages stop it from becoming paper attribution.
41 live trades, 3 ledger trades, copy-risk 71/100.
3 closed markets. Enough to inspect, not enough to trust.
No market-level spread or simulated execution cost is attached yet.
No source/expiry/dispute risk context is attached yet.
No market liquidity/depth context is attached yet.
No delayed-entry simulation is attached yet.
No paper receipts attribute this wallet signal to later outcomes yet.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
8%
Sample
limited
3 ledger trades
Top market concentration
England vs. Croatia: O/U 3.5
$50.0K · 63% of recorded whale volume
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 41
- Avg trade size
- $311.50
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jul 27, 16:10 UTC
- Last active
- Jul 29, 19:23 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 3 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read; copy-risk is inverted so green means lower risk of over-reading the wallet.