Sugary-Voyage
0x0d0f04ab2c90052d7b9ea81ec4cb8b26118fa318
Wallet digest
Activity score
45/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
200
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-654.3K
Realised
$4.2K
Win rate
38%
8 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 200- YES
Fed decreases interest rates by 50+ bps after September 2025 meeting?
61617 shares @ 8.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 17, 2025$0.00
$-5.5K
- OVER
Athletic Club vs. Paris Saint-Germain FC: O/U 2.5
60000 shares @ 9.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 10, 2025$0.00
$-5.9K
- YES
Will Paris FC win on 2025-09-21?
50000 shares @ 14.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 21, 2025$0.00
$-7.0K
- YES
No change in Fed interest rates after September 2025 meeting?
40309 shares @ 2.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 17, 2025$0.00
$-1.0K
- OVER
Sunderland AFC vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 2.5
38370 shares @ 39.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 1, 2026$0.00
$-15.0K
- YES
Will Trump attend UFC 319?
37886 shares @ 19.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Aug 17, 2025$0.00
$-7.2K
- OVER
Brighton & Hove Albion FC vs. Sunderland AFC: O/U 1.5
37199 shares @ 26.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 20, 2025$0.00
$-9.7K
- OVER
Real Oviedo vs. Mallorca: O/U 2.5
33800 shares @ 17.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 5, 2025$0.00
$-6.0K
- NO
Will Aston Villa win on 2025-11-09?
31200 shares @ 59.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 9, 2025$0.00
$-18.4K
- OVER
Burnley FC vs. Crystal Palace: O/U 2.5
30999 shares @ 17.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 3, 2025$0.00
$-5.4K
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYSunderland AFC vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 2.5$520.60Jan 1, 20:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYSunderland AFC vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 2.5$1.2KJan 1, 20:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYSunderland AFC vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 2.5$271.05Jan 1, 20:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYSunderland AFC vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 2.5$31.59Jan 1, 20:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYSunderland AFC vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 2.5$0.64Jan 1, 20:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYSunderland AFC vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 2.5$271.05Jan 1, 20:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYSunderland AFC vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 2.5$0.64Jan 1, 20:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYSunderland AFC vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 2.5$601.77Jan 1, 20:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYSunderland AFC vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 2.5$31.59Jan 1, 20:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYSunderland AFC vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 2.5$1.2KJan 1, 20:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYSunderland AFC vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 2.5$89.83Jan 1, 20:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYSunderland AFC vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 2.5$1.2KJan 1, 20:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYSunderland AFC vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 2.5$3.38Jan 1, 20:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYSunderland AFC vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 2.5$0.64Jan 1, 20:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYSunderland AFC vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 2.5$1.42Jan 1, 20:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYSunderland AFC vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 2.5$0.64Jan 1, 20:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYSunderland AFC vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 2.5$85.02Jan 1, 20:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYSunderland AFC vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 2.5$335.40Jan 1, 20:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYSunderland AFC vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 2.5$370.50Jan 1, 20:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYSunderland AFC vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 2.5$39.00Jan 1, 20:33 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 50
- Avg trade size
- $217.27
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jan 1, 20:32 UTC
- Last active
- Jan 1, 20:35 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 8 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".