Aching-Form
0x0d901fbc67d4738d88dee05106d19966fc0650ec
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
26
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-330.76
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 26- NO
Israel x Hezbollah ceasefire by June 30, 2026?
1485 shares @ 2.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 30, 2026$0.00
$-32.87
- NO
Will Al Ahli Saudi Club win on 2026-02-26?
364 shares @ 11.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 26, 2026$0.00
$-40.04
- NO
Will Newcastle United FC win on 2026-02-24?
238 shares @ 2.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 24, 2026$0.00
$-6.66
- OVER
Total Kills Over/Under 66.5 in Game 1?
110 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 26, 2026$0.00
$-1.10
- YES
Will Liverpool FC win on 2026-03-03?
105 shares @ 64.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 3, 2026$0.00
$-67.34
- OVER
Watford FC vs. Ipswich Town FC: O/U 4.5
100 shares @ 5.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 24, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
- NO
Will Manchester City FC vs. Nottingham Forest FC end in a draw?
57 shares @ 67.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 4, 2026$0.00
$-38.71
- UNDER
Newcastle United FC vs. Qarabağ Ağdam FK: O/U 2.5
51 shares @ 8.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 24, 2026$0.00
$-4.21
- UNDER
Newcastle United FC vs. Qarabağ Ağdam FK: O/U 1.5
50 shares @ 10.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 24, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
- AM GAMING
Counter-Strike: illwill vs AM Gaming - Map 2 Winner
46 shares @ 22.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 24, 2026$0.00
$-10.12
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYIsrael x Hezbollah ceasefire by June 30, 2026?$32.87Apr 16, 15:45 UTC
- REDEEMWill the Iranian regime fall by March 31?$6.00Apr 4, 13:04 UTC
- REDEEMWill Manchester City FC win on 2026-03-04?$20.83Mar 5, 20:49 UTC
- REDEEMWill Nottingham Forest FC win on 2026-03-04?$56.25Mar 5, 20:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Manchester City FC win on 2026-03-04?$10.00Mar 4, 20:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Manchester City FC vs. Nottingham Forest FC end in a draw?$8.38Mar 4, 20:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Manchester City FC vs. Nottingham Forest FC end in a draw?$8.38Mar 4, 20:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Nottingham Forest FC win on 2026-03-04?$9.53Mar 4, 20:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Manchester City FC vs. Nottingham Forest FC end in a draw?$4.96Mar 4, 20:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Manchester City FC vs. Nottingham Forest FC end in a draw?$8.63Mar 4, 20:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Nottingham Forest FC win on 2026-03-04?$9.53Mar 4, 20:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Manchester City FC vs. Nottingham Forest FC end in a draw?$8.38Mar 4, 20:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Nottingham Forest FC win on 2026-03-04?$4.87Mar 4, 20:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Nottingham Forest FC win on 2026-03-04?$9.54Mar 4, 20:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Nottingham Forest FC win on 2026-03-04?$4.20Mar 4, 20:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Nottingham Forest FC win on 2026-03-04?$9.53Mar 4, 20:47 UTC
- REDEEMWill Liverpool FC win on 2026-03-03?$65.59Mar 4, 20:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Liverpool FC win on 2026-03-03?$9.13Mar 3, 21:16 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Liverpool FC win on 2026-03-03?$3.15Mar 3, 21:16 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Liverpool FC win on 2026-03-03?$3.15Mar 3, 21:16 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 45
- Avg trade size
- $8.08
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Feb 25, 21:58 UTC
- Last active
- Apr 16, 15:45 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".