Sudden-Certainty
0x0e81723be1f654825474f733bb8dd9f24730a0e9
Activity score
83/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
2
Open notional
$1.0K
Total PnL
$-126.19
Realised
$-111.60
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWuxi: Jie Cui vs Alexis Galarneau$342.862h ago
- TRADEBUYWuxi: Jie Cui vs Alexis Galarneau$3.402h ago
- TRADEBUYWuxi: Jie Cui vs Alexis Galarneau$2.232h ago
- TRADEBUYWuxi: Jie Cui vs Alexis Galarneau$2.402h ago
- TRADEBUYWuxi: Jie Cui vs Alexis Galarneau$3.402h ago
- TRADEBUYWuxi: Jie Cui vs Alexis Galarneau$4.412h ago
- TRADEBUYWuxi: Jie Cui vs Alexis Galarneau$2.232h ago
- TRADEBUYWuxi: Jie Cui vs Alexis Galarneau$11.132h ago
- TRADEBUYWuxi: Jie Cui vs Alexis Galarneau$2.402h ago
- TRADEBUYWuxi: Jie Cui vs Alexis Galarneau$4.452h ago
- TRADEBUYWuxi: Jie Cui vs Alexis Galarneau$3.452h ago
- TRADEBUYWuxi: Jie Cui vs Alexis Galarneau$3.452h ago
- TRADEBUYWuxi: Jie Cui vs Alexis Galarneau$8.592h ago
- TRADEBUYWuxi: Jie Cui vs Alexis Galarneau$28.982h ago
- TRADEBUYWuxi: Jie Cui vs Alexis Galarneau$11.702h ago
- TRADEBUYWuxi: Jie Cui vs Alexis Galarneau$20.212h ago
- TRADEBUYWuxi: Jie Cui vs Alexis Galarneau$20.212h ago
- TRADEBUYWuxi: Jie Cui vs Alexis Galarneau$2.232h ago
- TRADEBUYWuxi: Jie Cui vs Alexis Galarneau$332.302h ago
- TRADEBUYWuxi: Jie Cui vs Alexis Galarneau$229.823h ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 41
- Avg trade size
- $78.41
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 57d ago
- Last active
- 2h ago
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".