Back-Hatchling
0x0ed585cbce774680c6bee03d443c4d14889c1ddc
Wallet digest
Activity score
85/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$87.81
Total PnL
$3.51
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Uzbekistan win on 2026-06-23?$84.40Jun 23, 11:13 UTC
- REDEEMWill Bitcoin reach $78,000 on May 28?$34.83Jun 23, 11:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin reach $78,000 on May 28?$34.76May 28, 12:26 UTC
- REDEEMWill XRP reach $2.80 in April?$84.42May 28, 12:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill XRP reach $2.80 in April?$84.18Apr 23, 21:40 UTC
- REDEEMWill Google reach $420 in March?$84.00Apr 23, 21:39 UTC
- REWARD$0.19Mar 15, 00:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Google reach $420 in March?$83.58Mar 13, 11:04 UTC
- REDEEMWill Oracle be the third-largest company in the world by market cap on February 28?$84.77Mar 13, 10:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Oracle be the third-largest company in the world by market cap on February 28?$84.69Feb 3, 23:44 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Dick Schoof become the next Prime Minister of the Netherlands?$52.95Feb 3, 23:43 UTC
- REDEEMWill XRP dip to $0.60 in January?$31.74Feb 3, 23:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill XRP dip to $0.60 in January?$31.68Jan 9, 01:47 UTC
- REDEEMWill India invade Pakistan in 2025?$31.68Jan 9, 01:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill India invade Pakistan in 2025?$31.27Dec 9, 19:11 UTC
- REDEEMWill NAC Breda win on 2025-11-01?$0.00Dec 7, 16:03 UTC
- REDEEMWill AFC Ajax vs. SC Heerenveen end in a draw?$0.00Dec 7, 16:03 UTC
- REDEEMAFC Ajax vs. SC Heerenveen: O/U 3.5$0.00Dec 7, 16:03 UTC
- REDEEMPSV vs. Fortuna Sittard: O/U 4.5$0.00Dec 7, 16:03 UTC
- REDEEMSpread: AFC Ajax (-1.5)$0.00Dec 7, 16:03 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Wallet edge sanity
Do not mirror
0/100Treat this wallet as noise/context only until resolved history, copy-risk, and liquidity checks improve.
Win rate is hidden until at least 3 closed markets exist for this wallet.
Large size, concentration, or thin history makes this wallet unsafe to imitate.
Required before treating wallet flow as useful
Only 0 closed markets; headline win rate is intentionally hidden.
A wallet trade is not useful unless a later follower could still enter after spread, slippage, and latency.
Large positions need enough depth to exit; mark-to-market PnL is not cash.
The trade still needs source, expiry, dispute, and settlement checks at the market level.
Leaderboards surface visible winners; losing or abandoned wallets disappear from attention.
Wallet intelligence filter
Blocked
0/100Wallet flow is blocked as an intelligence signal until hard failures are fixed.
Wallet activity exists, but copy-risk is too high for interpretation.
Too few closed markets. Do not infer edge from open PnL or leaderboard rank.
No market-level spread or simulated execution cost is attached yet.
No source/expiry/dispute risk context is attached yet.
No market liquidity/depth context is attached yet.
No delayed-entry simulation is attached yet.
No paper receipts attribute this wallet signal to later outcomes yet.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 19
- Avg trade size
- $84.43
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Nov 24, 06:31 UTC
- Last active
- Jun 23, 11:13 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read; copy-risk is inverted so green means lower risk of over-reading the wallet.