Regular-Gelding
0x0fe3383759fb9f5eb6f23f1fa33dd21e2158d6e1
Wallet digest
Activity score
44/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
3
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-2.2K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYSpread: 76ers (-6.5)$41.00Mar 25, 13:30 UTC
- REDEEMMagic vs. Cavaliers: O/U 229.5$41.00Mar 25, 09:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYMagic vs. Cavaliers: O/U 229.5$21.73Mar 24, 11:58 UTC
- REDEEMSpread: Lakers (-2.5)$13.00Mar 24, 09:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Lakers (-2.5)$6.50Mar 23, 11:25 UTC
- REDEEMKings vs. Knicks: O/U 230.5$2.5KJan 28, 09:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYBucks vs. 76ers: O/U 220.5$409.86Jan 27, 09:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYBucks vs. 76ers: O/U 220.5$743.58Jan 27, 09:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYKings vs. Knicks: O/U 230.5$1.2KJan 27, 09:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Knicks (-13.5)$1.0KJan 27, 09:41 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 7
- Avg trade size
- $497.93
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jan 27, 09:41 UTC
- Last active
- Mar 25, 13:30 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".