Every-Scarecrow
0x108512b011fc8950dfae5b6873f302b2607d3269
Wallet digest
Activity score
43/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
2
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-307.50
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- REDEEMNasdaq 100 (NDX) Up or Down on November 21?$5.00Nov 25, 08:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYNasdaq 100 (NDX) Up or Down on November 21?$2.75Nov 21, 06:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYTesla (TSLA) Up or Down on November 20?$3.50Nov 20, 07:43 UTC
- REDEEMNVIDIA (NVDA) Up or Down on November 19?$5.00Nov 20, 02:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYNVIDIA (NVDA) Up or Down on November 19?$3.00Nov 19, 07:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYApple (AAPL) Up or Down on November 14?$304.00Nov 14, 03:56 UTC
- REDEEMRocket Lab (RKLB) Up or Down on November 12?$300.00Nov 13, 09:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYRocket Lab (RKLB) Up or Down on November 12?$90.00Nov 12, 08:29 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 5
- Avg trade size
- $80.65
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Nov 12, 08:29 UTC
- Last active
- Nov 25, 08:00 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".