Immaterial-Flame
0x11f8d2e6a61e94b374a53d0077cddaf384b70c9e
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
52
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-852.30
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 52- YES
Will Damac Saudi Club win on 2026-01-21?
455 shares @ 2.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 21, 2026$0.00
$-10.00
- YES
Will Sport Lisboa e Benfica win on 2026-02-17?
231 shares @ 31.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 17, 2026$0.00
$-71.47
- YES
Will Coritiba FBC win on 2026-01-28?
228 shares @ 27.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 28, 2026$0.00
$-61.46
- YES
Will the highest temperature in New York City be 36°F or higher on January 19?
213 shares @ 7.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 19, 2026$0.00
$-16.13
- BRONCOS
Patriots vs. Broncos
196 shares @ 35.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 25, 2026$0.00
$-68.48
- YES
Will Casa Pia AC win on 2026-01-23?
181 shares @ 97.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 23, 2026$0.00
$-176.00
- YES
Will FC Internazionale Milano win on 2026-01-20?
173 shares @ 2.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 20, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
- GRIZZLIES
Grizzlies vs. Magic
130 shares @ 77.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 15, 2026$0.00
$-100.00
- YES
Will FC Barcelona win on 2026-01-18?
114 shares @ 59.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 18, 2026$0.00
$-67.18
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - February 16, 5:10PM-5:15PM ET
100 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 16, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Sport Lisboa e Benfica win on 2026-02-17?$71.47Feb 17, 15:27 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Girona FC win on 2026-02-16?$71.35Feb 16, 23:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - February 16, 5:20PM-5:25PM ET$1.00Feb 16, 22:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - February 16, 5:10PM-5:15PM ET$1.00Feb 16, 22:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Girona FC win on 2026-02-16?$10.00Feb 16, 20:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYSeahawks vs. Patriots$7.85Feb 8, 22:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Albacete Balompié win on 2026-02-03?$1.00Feb 3, 20:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Albacete Balompié win on 2026-02-03?$1.00Feb 3, 20:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Albacete Balompié win on 2026-02-03?$1.00Feb 3, 20:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Coritiba FBC win on 2026-01-28?$61.46Jan 28, 22:21 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Sport Lisboa e Benfica win on 2026-01-28?$60.99Jan 28, 21:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Real Madrid CF win on 2026-01-28?$5.00Jan 28, 21:43 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Sport Lisboa e Benfica win on 2026-01-28?$3.50Jan 28, 21:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Sport Lisboa e Benfica win on 2026-01-28?$20.00Jan 28, 04:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYPatriots vs. Broncos$68.48Jan 25, 20:05 UTC
- TRADESELLFlorida Atlantic Owls vs. South Florida Bulls: O/U 166.5$4.19Jan 25, 20:00 UTC
- TRADESELLFlorida Atlantic Owls vs. South Florida Bulls: O/U 167.5$4.52Jan 25, 20:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYFlorida Atlantic Owls vs. South Florida Bulls: O/U 166.5$10.00Jan 25, 18:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYFlorida Atlantic Owls vs. South Florida Bulls: O/U 167.5$10.00Jan 25, 18:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYFlorida Atlantic Owls vs. South Florida Bulls$4.90Jan 25, 18:48 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 46
- Avg trade size
- $27.25
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jan 23, 05:17 UTC
- Last active
- Feb 17, 15:27 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".