Harmonious-Chasm
0x131ddc5d8e05ab8acda061e9a7c32c0f59db2656
Wallet digest
Activity score
45/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-40.89
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Solana dip to $120 by January 31, 2025?$15.44Jan 31, 18:37 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Solana dip to $120 by January 31, 2025?$12.07Jan 31, 18:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Solana dip to $120 by January 31, 2025?$13.39Jan 31, 17:35 UTC
- TRADESELLWill the Boston Celtics win the Eastern Conference?$28.28Jan 19, 05:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the Boston Celtics win the Eastern Conference?$28.90Jan 19, 04:02 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Real Madrid win La Liga?$35.67Jan 19, 02:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Real Madrid win La Liga?$36.29Jan 19, 00:28 UTC
- TRADESELLBitcoin all time high by January 31?$33.95Jan 18, 15:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin all time high by January 31?$33.47Jan 18, 14:07 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 9
- Avg trade size
- $26.38
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jan 18, 14:07 UTC
- Last active
- Jan 31, 18:37 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".