Dirty-Diving
0x169d73848761ec7a4a305d9cbf69f280841cfb3d
Wallet digest
Activity score
57/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
23
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-4.2K
Realised
$260.20
Win rate
67%
6 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 23- BANGLADESH
ICC T20 World Cup, Women: India vs Bangladesh
25533 shares @ 2.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 2, 2026$0.00
$-690.41
- ENGLAND
ICC T20 World Cup, Women: England vs Australia
19163 shares @ 0.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 12, 2026$0.00
$-120.76
- NO
Will France win on 2026-07-04?
15000 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 4, 2026$0.00
$-150.00
- TAYLOR FRITZ
Wimbledon ATP: Taylor Fritz vs Alexander Zverev
15000 shares @ 0.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 15, 2026$0.00
$-30.00
- NO
Will Netherlands win on 2026-06-25?
15000 shares @ 5.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 25, 2026$0.00
$-750.00
- NO
Will Brazil win on 2026-06-29?
15000 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 29, 2026$0.00
$-150.00
- NO
Will Argentina win on 2026-07-07?
15000 shares @ 1.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 7, 2026$0.00
$-259.99
- NO
Will Morocco win on 2026-07-04?
15000 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 4, 2026$0.00
$-150.00
- NO
Will Spain win on 2026-07-02?
14000 shares @ 1.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 2, 2026$0.00
$-175.00
- NO
Will France win on 2026-06-30?
14000 shares @ 2.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 30, 2026$0.00
$-308.00
Recent activity
- REDEEMKKS Lech Poznań vs. Aarhus GF: Team to Advance$14.2KJul 30, 01:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYKKS Lech Poznań vs. Aarhus GF: Team to Advance$38.42Jul 30, 01:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYKKS Lech Poznań vs. Aarhus GF: Team to Advance$7.7KJul 29, 23:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYKKS Lech Poznań vs. Aarhus GF: Team to Advance$19.98Jul 29, 22:49 UTC
- REDEEMWill Aarhus GF win on 2026-07-29?$124.00Jul 29, 22:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYKKS Lech Poznań vs. Aarhus GF: Team to Advance$141.66Jul 29, 21:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYKKS Lech Poznań vs. Aarhus GF: Team to Advance$12.21Jul 29, 21:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYKKS Lech Poznań vs. Aarhus GF: Team to Advance$185.55Jul 29, 20:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYKKS Lech Poznań vs. Aarhus GF: Team to Advance$39.68Jul 29, 20:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYKKS Lech Poznań vs. Aarhus GF: Team to Advance$1.44Jul 29, 20:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYKKS Lech Poznań vs. Aarhus GF: Team to Advance$86.86Jul 29, 20:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYKKS Lech Poznań vs. Aarhus GF: Team to Advance$61.60Jul 29, 20:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYKKS Lech Poznań vs. Aarhus GF: Team to Advance$325.38Jul 29, 20:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYKKS Lech Poznań vs. Aarhus GF: Team to Advance$1.5KJul 29, 20:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYKKS Lech Poznań vs. Aarhus GF: Team to Advance$716.28Jul 29, 19:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYKKS Lech Poznań vs. Aarhus GF: Team to Advance$999.00Jul 29, 19:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYKKS Lech Poznań vs. Aarhus GF: Team to Advance$25.38Jul 29, 19:52 UTC
- TRADEBUYKKS Lech Poznań vs. Aarhus GF: Team to Advance$10.04Jul 29, 19:52 UTC
- TRADEBUYKKS Lech Poznań vs. Aarhus GF: Team to Advance$199.80Jul 29, 19:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYKKS Lech Poznań vs. Aarhus GF: Team to Advance$78.43Jul 29, 19:49 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Wallet edge sanity
Do not mirror
17/100Treat this wallet as noise/context only until resolved history, copy-risk, and liquidity checks improve.
Closed-market sample is still too small to treat the win rate as durable.
Use this wallet as an attention signal only, then verify liquidity and resolution risk.
Many positions were entered near obvious prices, which can inflate win rate while hiding tail risk.
Required before treating wallet flow as useful
67% win rate over 6 closed markets.
A wallet trade is not useful unless a later follower could still enter after spread, slippage, and latency.
Large positions need enough depth to exit; mark-to-market PnL is not cash.
The trade still needs source, expiry, dispute, and settlement checks at the market level.
Leaderboards surface visible winners; losing or abandoned wallets disappear from attention.
Wallet intelligence filter
Watch only
0/100Wallet flow is useful for attention, but missing/review stages stop it from becoming paper attribution.
46 live trades, 0 ledger trades, copy-risk 60/100.
6 closed markets. Enough to inspect, not enough to trust.
No market-level spread or simulated execution cost is attached yet.
No source/expiry/dispute risk context is attached yet.
No market liquidity/depth context is attached yet.
No delayed-entry simulation is attached yet.
No paper receipts attribute this wallet signal to later outcomes yet.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 46
- Avg trade size
- $333.66
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jul 21, 19:58 UTC
- Last active
- Jul 30, 01:12 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 6 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read; copy-risk is inverted so green means lower risk of over-reading the wallet.