Favorable-Commercial
0x1788f9cfd8cc5848d0c2782c32c763fd235c0994
Activity score
75/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
3
Open notional
$5.1K
Total PnL
$-1.6K
Realised
$-10.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYTimberwolves vs. Spurs: O/U 216.5$1.0645m ago
- TRADEBUYTimberwolves vs. Spurs: O/U 216.5$18.8045m ago
- TRADEBUYTimberwolves vs. Spurs: O/U 216.5$84.6045m ago
- TRADEBUYTimberwolves vs. Spurs: O/U 216.5$59.9845m ago
- TRADEBUYTimberwolves vs. Spurs: O/U 216.5$1.0845m ago
- TRADEBUYTimberwolves vs. Spurs: O/U 216.5$2.6645m ago
- TRADEBUYTimberwolves vs. Spurs: O/U 216.5$54.6445m ago
- TRADEBUYTimberwolves vs. Spurs: O/U 216.5$4.3946m ago
- TRADEBUYTimberwolves vs. Spurs: O/U 216.5$2.5546m ago
- TRADEBUYTimberwolves vs. Spurs: O/U 216.5$4.4646m ago
- TRADEBUYTimberwolves vs. Spurs: O/U 216.5$15.6146m ago
- TRADEBUYTimberwolves vs. Spurs: O/U 216.5$9.4046m ago
- TRADEBUYTimberwolves vs. Spurs: O/U 216.5$4.8046m ago
- TRADEBUYTimberwolves vs. Spurs: O/U 216.5$95.8846m ago
- TRADEBUYTimberwolves vs. Spurs: O/U 216.5$54.6446m ago
- TRADEBUYTimberwolves vs. Spurs: O/U 216.5$4.2146m ago
- TRADEBUYTimberwolves vs. Spurs: O/U 216.5$1.1946m ago
- TRADEBUYTimberwolves vs. Spurs: O/U 216.5$3.5646m ago
- TRADEBUYTimberwolves vs. Spurs: O/U 216.5$8.8746m ago
- TRADEBUYTimberwolves vs. Spurs: O/U 216.5$2.0K1h ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 41
- Avg trade size
- $631.74
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 97d ago
- Last active
- 45m ago
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".