Measly-Cutlet
0x178e5f04f700ff02c37f6ec53159acce06dc76f7
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
36
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-116.1K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 36- HANWHA LIFE
League of Legends: Hanwha Life Esports vs. Gen.G
28366 shares @ 20.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Aug 24, 2025$0.00
$-5.9K
- NO
Will Spirit win the BLAST Bounty 2025 Season tournament?
22471 shares @ 27.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Aug 18, 2025$0.00
$-6.1K
- DRX
League of Legends: DRX vs. Dplus KIA
21664 shares @ 38.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 31, 2025$0.00
$-8.4K
- JD GAMING
League of Legends: Bilibili Gaming vs. JD Gaming
19709 shares @ 50.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Aug 7, 2025$0.00
$-9.9K
- LNG
League of Legends: Ultra Prime vs. LNG Esports
16994 shares @ 78.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Aug 9, 2025$0.00
$-13.3K
- FUNPLUS
League of Legends: Anyone's Legend vs. FunPlus Phoenix
14921 shares @ 29.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Aug 9, 2025$0.00
$-4.4K
- NIP
League of Legends: EDward Gaming vs. Ninjas in Pyjamas
13142 shares @ 54.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 26, 2025$0.00
$-7.1K
- INVICTUS GAMING
League of Legends: Anyone's Legend vs. Invictus Gaming
11500 shares @ 22.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Aug 16, 2025$0.00
$-2.5K
- HANWHA LIFE
League of Legends: Hanwha Life Esports vs. T1
10901 shares @ 35.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Aug 16, 2025$0.00
$-3.8K
- WEIBO GAMING
League of Legends: Weibo Gaming vs. Invictus Gaming
10499 shares @ 12.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Aug 24, 2025$0.00
$-1.3K
Recent activity
- REDEEMClippers vs. Raptors$20.00Mar 19, 12:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYClippers vs. Raptors$9.20Jan 17, 00:02 UTC
- REDEEMSpread: Hawks (-8.5)$20.00Jan 16, 23:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Hawks (-8.5)$8.60Nov 25, 07:53 UTC
- REDEEMClippers vs. Suns$20.00Nov 7, 14:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYClippers vs. Suns$5.70Nov 6, 12:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYClippers vs. Suns$5.70Nov 6, 12:12 UTC
- REDEEMLeague of Legends: Team Vitality vs. Movistar KOI$3.0KAug 26, 23:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYLeague of Legends: Team Vitality vs. Movistar KOI$2.1KAug 26, 13:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYLeague of Legends: FunPlus Phoenix vs. Bilibili Gaming$10.00Aug 25, 13:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYLeague of Legends: FunPlus Phoenix vs. Bilibili Gaming$150.25Aug 25, 13:01 UTC
- REDEEMWill The MongolZ win the 2025 CS2 Esports World Cup Tournament?$6.3KAug 24, 17:39 UTC
- REDEEMWill Aurora win the 2025 CS2 Esports World Cup Tournament?$19.8KAug 24, 17:39 UTC
- REDEEMLeague of Legends: KT Rolster vs. T1$831.71Aug 24, 13:40 UTC
- REDEEMLeague of Legends: EDward Gaming vs. LNG Esports$12.0KAug 24, 13:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Aurora win the 2025 CS2 Esports World Cup Tournament?$14.2KAug 24, 11:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Aurora win the 2025 CS2 Esports World Cup Tournament?$319.50Aug 24, 10:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill The MongolZ win the 2025 CS2 Esports World Cup Tournament?$1.5KAug 24, 10:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill The MongolZ win the 2025 CS2 Esports World Cup Tournament?$2.6KAug 24, 10:16 UTC
- TRADEBUYLeague of Legends: EDward Gaming vs. LNG Esports$10.7KAug 24, 09:49 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 37
- Avg trade size
- $1.5K
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Aug 22, 18:46 UTC
- Last active
- Mar 19, 12:22 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".