Colorless-Shame
0x19b15b5fbf2d8afd4ba34293c2f91e108d617f56
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
19
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-1.8K
Realised
$949.80
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 19- YES
Will Elon tweet 300-324 times Jan 24-31?
15600 shares @ 3.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 31, 2025$0.00
$-588.54
- YES
Will Elon tweet 350-374 times Jan 17-24?
7000 shares @ 1.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 24, 2025$0.00
$-136.98
- YES
Will Elon tweet 600-624 times Jan 31 - Feb 7?
6260 shares @ 12.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 7, 2025$0.00
$-775.60
- YES
Will Elon tweet 325-349 times Jan 24-31?
4000 shares @ 1.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 31, 2025$0.00
$-63.98
- YES
Will Elon tweet 325-349 times Jan 31 - Feb 7?
3301 shares @ 6.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 7, 2025$0.00
$-198.08
- YES
Will Elon tweet 400-424 times Jan 17-24?
3000 shares @ 0.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 24, 2025$0.00
$-6.00
- YES
Will Elon tweet 300-324 times Jan 31 - Feb 7?
3000 shares @ 5.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 7, 2025$0.00
$-150.00
- YES
Will Elon tweet 375-399 times Jan 17-24?
3000 shares @ 0.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 24, 2025$0.00
$-15.00
- YES
Will Elon tweet 275-299 times Jan 31 - Feb 7?
2000 shares @ 3.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 7, 2025$0.00
$-62.00
- YES
Will Elon tweet 375-399 times Dec 27-Jan 3?
2000 shares @ 19.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 3, 2025$0.00
$-384.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Elon tweet 210–224 times July 18–25?$5.26Jul 25, 10:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon tweet 210–224 times July 18–25?$0.76Jul 25, 10:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon tweet 210–224 times July 18–25?$1.58Jul 25, 10:14 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Zohran Mamdani win the 2025 NYC mayoral election?$7.95Jul 25, 10:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon tweet 195–209 times July 11–18?$41.76Jul 18, 12:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Zohran Mamdani win the 2025 NYC mayoral election?$8.06Jul 11, 09:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon tweet 180–194 times June 27–July 4?$0.32Jul 4, 12:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon tweet 180–194 times June 27–July 4?$1.27Jul 4, 12:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon tweet 180–194 times June 27–July 4?$0.81Jul 4, 12:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon tweet 105–119 times June 27–July 4?$12.00Jun 30, 07:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon tweet 105–119 times June 27–July 4?$3.70Jun 30, 07:54 UTC
- REWARD$0.45Feb 8, 00:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon tweet 600-624 times Jan 31 - Feb 7?$75.61Feb 7, 03:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon tweet 600-624 times Jan 31 - Feb 7?$80.00Feb 7, 03:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon tweet 600-624 times Jan 31 - Feb 7?$120.00Feb 7, 03:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon tweet 600-624 times Jan 31 - Feb 7?$89.82Feb 7, 03:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon tweet 600-624 times Jan 31 - Feb 7?$49.56Feb 7, 03:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon tweet 600-624 times Jan 31 - Feb 7?$0.62Feb 7, 03:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon tweet 600-624 times Jan 31 - Feb 7?$156.16Feb 7, 03:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon tweet 600-624 times Jan 31 - Feb 7?$13.84Feb 7, 03:17 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 49
- Avg trade size
- $24.77
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Feb 2, 05:35 UTC
- Last active
- Jul 25, 10:15 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".