Thoughtful-Affect
0x19b81fbe611ebea4328d02570436b1ef5f4190e2
Activity score
65/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
20
Open notional
$28.11
Total PnL
$-1.0K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 20- SPARTA
Counter-Strike: SPARTA vs fnatic (BO3) - ESL Challenger League Europe Cup #4 Playoffs
6 shares @ 50.0¢·now 49.5¢·exp May 2, 2026$2.97
$-0.03
- YES
Will FC Arouca vs. CD Santa Clara end in a draw?
2 shares @ 51.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 2, 2026$2.35
$1.15
- NO
Will Gil Vicente FC win on 2026-05-03?
4 shares @ 52.0¢·now 51.0¢·exp May 3, 2026$2.25
$-0.04
- NO
Will CD Nacional win on 2026-05-02?
2 shares @ 57.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 2, 2026$2.21
$0.95
- YES
Will Sport Lisboa e Benfica win on 2026-05-02?
4 shares @ 61.0¢·now 58.5¢·exp May 2, 2026$2.07
$-0.09
- SHARKS
Counter-Strike: Sharks vs BET-M 33 (BO3) - Stake Ranked Episode 2: Closed Qualifier Playoffs
4 shares @ 55.0¢·now 55.5¢·exp May 2, 2026$2.02
$0.02
- NO
Will the Toronto Raptors win the 2026 NBA Finals?
2 shares @ 99.8¢·now 99.4¢·exp Jul 1, 2026$1.99
$-0.01
- ALZON
Counter-Strike: BESTIA Academy vs Alzon (BO3) - CCT South America Series #1 Group Stage
5 shares @ 33.0¢·now 32.5¢·exp May 3, 2026$1.50
$-0.02
- MANA ESPORTS
Counter-Strike: INOX Division vs MANA eSports (BO3) - CCT Europe Closed Qualifier: Series #1 Play-In
5 shares @ 26.0¢·now 29.0¢·exp May 2, 2026$1.39
$0.14
- BOUNTY HUNTERS ESPORTS
Counter-Strike: Galorys vs Bounty Hunters Esports (BO3) - ESL Challenger League South America Cup #4 Playoffs
3 shares @ 52.0¢·now 51.0¢·exp May 3, 2026$1.33
$-0.03
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Galorys vs Bounty Hunters Esports (BO3) - ESL Challenger League South America Cup #4 Playoffs$1.3856m ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Vitality vs GamerLegion (BO3) - BLAST Rivals Playoffs$1.0257m ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: BESTIA Academy vs Alzon (BO3) - CCT South America Series #1 Group Stage$1.5557m ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Game Hunters vs METANOIA WOLVES (BO3) - Odyssey Cup Brazil Group Stage$1.3658m ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: HAVENs vs P2N (BO3) - Exort Series Contenders Stage$1.0858m ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Sharks vs BET-M 33 (BO3) - Stake Ranked Episode 2: Closed Qualifier Playoffs$2.0358m ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs FaZe (BO3) - BLAST Rivals Playoffs$1.2558m ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Walczaki vs AaB Esport (BO3) - BC Game Masters Europe Series #1 Group Stage$1.1559m ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: INOX Division vs MANA eSports (BO3) - CCT Europe Closed Qualifier: Series #1 Play-In$1.2859m ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Turma do Pagode vs Bounty Hunters Esports (BO3) - Odyssey Cup Brazil Group Stage$1.3459m ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: SPARTA vs fnatic (BO3) - ESL Challenger League Europe Cup #4 Playoffs$3.041h ago
- TRADEBUYWill Gil Vicente FC win on 2026-05-03?$2.321h ago
- TRADEBUYWill FC Alverca win on 2026-05-02?$1.071h ago
- TRADEBUYWill Sport Lisboa e Benfica win on 2026-05-02?$2.191h ago
- TRADEBUYWill FC Arouca vs. CD Santa Clara end in a draw?$1.221h ago
- TRADEBUYWill Moreirense FC win on 2026-05-02?$1.251h ago
- TRADEBUYWill CD Nacional win on 2026-05-02?$1.281h ago
- REDEEMWill Rosenborg BK win on 2026-05-01?$1.051h ago
- REDEEMWill Albacete Balompié win on 2026-05-01?$1.151h ago
- REDEEMXRP Up or Down - May 1, 11AM ET$1.221h ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 33
- Avg trade size
- $32.25
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 1d ago
- Last active
- 56m ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".