Accomplished-Plate
0x1a947e60f9229bb8719eb4ef239884193daf769c
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
20
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-11.0K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 20- OVER
Cagliari Calcio vs. Udinese Calcio: O/U 2.5
8100 shares @ 18.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 9, 2026$0.00
$-1.5K
- MANCHESTER UNITED FC
Spread: Manchester United FC (-2.5)
6723 shares @ 7.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 9, 2026$0.00
$-532.57
- OVER
Liverpool FC vs. Chelsea FC: O/U 4.5
4875 shares @ 20.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 9, 2026$0.00
$-989.06
- OVER
Eintracht Braunschweig vs. SG Dynamo Dresden: O/U 4.5
2990 shares @ 13.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 9, 2026$0.00
$-400.00
- OVER
Elche CF vs. Deportivo Alavés: O/U 4.5
2969 shares @ 13.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 9, 2026$0.00
$-400.00
- OVER
Manchester City FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 4.5
2928 shares @ 13.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 19, 2026$0.00
$-394.68
- OVER
Borussia Mönchengladbach vs. 1. FSV Mainz 05: O/U 4.5
2437 shares @ 16.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 19, 2026$0.00
$-389.92
- OVER
Elche CF vs. Deportivo Alavés: O/U 3.5
2143 shares @ 28.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 9, 2026$0.00
$-600.00
- OVER
Borussia Mönchengladbach vs. 1. FSV Mainz 05: O/U 3.5
2140 shares @ 20.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 19, 2026$0.00
$-441.08
- OVER
Paris Saint-Germain FC vs. Olympique Lyonnais: O/U 4.5
2095 shares @ 25.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 19, 2026$0.00
$-523.73
Recent activity
- MAKER_REBATE$5.04May 10, 00:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Manchester United FC (-2.5)$547.28May 9, 14:12 UTC
- TRADESELLSunderland AFC vs. Manchester United FC: O/U 2.5$285.56May 9, 14:01 UTC
- TRADESELLSunderland AFC vs. Manchester United FC: O/U 3.5$109.72May 9, 14:01 UTC
- TRADESELLSunderland AFC vs. Manchester United FC: O/U 4.5$81.66May 9, 14:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYCagliari Calcio vs. Udinese Calcio: O/U 2.5$133.02May 9, 13:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYCagliari Calcio vs. Udinese Calcio: O/U 2.5$0.90May 9, 13:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYCagliari Calcio vs. Udinese Calcio: O/U 2.5$24.84May 9, 13:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYCagliari Calcio vs. Udinese Calcio: O/U 2.5$0.33May 9, 13:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYCagliari Calcio vs. Udinese Calcio: O/U 2.5$2.18May 9, 13:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYCagliari Calcio vs. Udinese Calcio: O/U 2.5$46.98May 9, 13:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYCagliari Calcio vs. Udinese Calcio: O/U 2.5$432.90May 9, 13:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYCagliari Calcio vs. Udinese Calcio: O/U 2.5$0.62May 9, 13:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYCagliari Calcio vs. Udinese Calcio: O/U 2.5$0.90May 9, 13:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYCagliari Calcio vs. Udinese Calcio: O/U 2.5$814.68May 9, 13:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYCagliari Calcio vs. Udinese Calcio: O/U 2.5$0.64May 9, 13:43 UTC
- TRADESELLHolstein Kiel vs. 1. FC Magdeburg: O/U 3.5$1.5KMay 9, 13:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYEintracht Braunschweig vs. SG Dynamo Dresden: O/U 3.5$409.00May 9, 11:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYVfL Bochum vs. Hannover 96: O/U 4.5$409.67May 9, 11:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYVfL Bochum vs. Hannover 96: O/U 3.5$609.88May 9, 11:03 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 48
- Avg trade size
- $267.76
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Apr 19, 18:30 UTC
- Last active
- May 10, 00:45 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".