Unhealthy-Installation
0x1aac7a475920cb17733c38678c524da794d44e55
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
15
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-884.39
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 15- OVER
Stade Brestois 29 vs. Olympique de Marseille: O/U 2.5
265 shares @ 75.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 20, 2026$0.00
$-199.00
- OVER
BV Borussia 09 Dortmund vs. Atalanta BC: O/U 2.5
225 shares @ 69.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 17, 2026$0.00
$-155.00
- YES
Will CA Belgrano win on 2026-02-19?
201 shares @ 96.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 19, 2026$0.00
$-194.24
- OVER
Lille OSC vs. FK Crvena zvezda: O/U 1.5
161 shares @ 81.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 19, 2026$0.00
$-130.38
- OVER
Real Madrid CF vs. Getafe CF: O/U 1.5
109 shares @ 73.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 2, 2026$0.00
$-79.25
- OVER
Lille OSC vs. Stade Brestois 29: O/U 2.5
72 shares @ 46.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 14, 2026$0.00
$-33.00
- OVER
Al Nassr Saudi Club vs. Al Taawoun Saudi Club: O/U 1.5
40 shares @ 86.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 26, 2026$0.00
$-34.00
- HAWKS
Bucks vs. Hawks
24 shares @ 49.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 19, 2026$0.00
$-12.00
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - February 16, 1:50PM-1:55PM ET
20 shares @ 40.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 16, 2026$0.00
$-8.00
- UNDER
SC Braga vs. Vitória SC: O/U 4.5
18 shares @ 64.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 21, 2026$0.00
$-11.83
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYReal Madrid CF vs. Elche CF: O/U 4.5$6.87Mar 14, 20:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYLille OSC vs. Aston Villa FC: O/U 1.5$2.95Mar 12, 18:16 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - March 12, 2:10PM-2:15PM ET$2.00Mar 12, 18:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYReal Madrid CF vs. Getafe CF: O/U 1.5$79.25Mar 2, 19:50 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Pisa SC vs. Bologna FC 1909 end in a draw?$79.25Mar 2, 19:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Pisa SC vs. Bologna FC 1909 end in a draw?$73.78Mar 2, 19:25 UTC
- TRADESELLOlympique de Marseille vs. Olympique Lyonnais: O/U 2.5$73.77Mar 1, 21:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYOlympique de Marseille vs. Olympique Lyonnais: O/U 2.5$101.67Mar 1, 19:54 UTC
- TRADESELLArsenal FC vs. Chelsea FC: O/U 1.5$101.68Mar 1, 19:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYArsenal FC vs. Chelsea FC: O/U 1.5$75.32Mar 1, 16:45 UTC
- REDEEMUS Cremonese vs. AC Milan: O/U 1.5$75.32Mar 1, 16:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYUS Cremonese vs. AC Milan: O/U 1.5$47.45Mar 1, 12:03 UTC
- REDEEMFC Internazionale Milano vs. Genoa CFC: O/U 1.5$47.45Mar 1, 10:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Internazionale Milano vs. Genoa CFC: O/U 1.5$35.11Feb 28, 20:05 UTC
- TRADESELLLiverpool FC vs. West Ham United FC: O/U 4.5$35.11Feb 28, 20:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYLiverpool FC vs. West Ham United FC: O/U 4.5$27.07Feb 28, 16:18 UTC
- TRADESELLLiverpool FC vs. West Ham United FC: O/U 3.5$27.06Feb 28, 16:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYLiverpool FC vs. West Ham United FC: O/U 3.5$19.51Feb 28, 15:32 UTC
- TRADESELLLiverpool FC vs. West Ham United FC: O/U 1.5$19.51Feb 28, 15:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYLiverpool FC vs. West Ham United FC: O/U 1.5$16.80Feb 28, 11:02 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 39
- Avg trade size
- $58.60
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Feb 19, 08:54 UTC
- Last active
- Mar 14, 20:45 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".