Snarling-Algorithm
0x1b7bf557247377a74a31433bd179c779a4ea3080
Wallet digest
Activity score
79/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
34
Open notional
$151.16
Total PnL
$-629.01
Realised
$-2.68
Win rate
69%
16 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 34- YES
Will Bitcoin dip to $50,000 by December 31, 2026?
120 shares @ 59.8¢·now 56.0¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$67.20
$-4.60
- YES
Will Bitcoin dip to $35,000 by December 31, 2026?
126 shares @ 25.0¢·now 19.5¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$24.57
$-6.93
- YES
Will Bitcoin dip to $40,000 by December 31, 2026?
68 shares @ 37.0¢·now 29.5¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$19.98
$-5.08
- YES
Will Bitcoin dip to $45,000 by December 31, 2026?
50 shares @ 48.0¢·now 39.5¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$19.75
$-4.25
- NO
Will Bitcoin reach $85,000 in March?
10 shares @ 90.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Apr 1, 2026$10.00
$1.00
- NO
Will Bitcoin reach $170,000 by December 31, 2026?
10 shares @ 93.0¢·now 96.6¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$9.66
$0.36
- YES
Will Elon Musk post 440-459 tweets from January 20 to January 27, 2026?
2030 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 27, 2026$0.00
$-2.12
- NO
Will Elon Musk post 380-399 tweets from January 20 to January 27, 2026?
1172 shares @ 11.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 27, 2026$0.00
$-131.54
- NO
Will Elon Musk post 520-539 tweets from December 30 to January 6, 2026?
1120 shares @ 3.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 6, 2026$0.00
$-37.64
- YES
Will Elon Musk post 200-219 tweets from February 13 to February 20, 2026?
1001 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 20, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
Recent activity
- YIELD$0.01Jun 4, 00:11 UTC
- YIELD$0.01Jun 3, 00:13 UTC
- YIELD$0.00Jun 2, 00:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $40,000 by December 31, 2026?$13.96Mar 12, 19:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $40,000 by December 31, 2026?$3.70Mar 12, 12:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $40,000 by December 31, 2026?$7.40Mar 12, 06:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $35,000 by December 31, 2026?$19.92Mar 11, 20:54 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $45,000 by December 31, 2026?$24.00Mar 11, 19:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $50,000 by December 31, 2026?$60.00Mar 11, 18:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $35,000 by December 31, 2026?$11.58Mar 11, 17:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $50,000 by December 31, 2026?$11.80Mar 10, 17:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $60,000 in March?$0.69Mar 10, 16:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $60,000 in March?$0.99Mar 10, 16:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $60,000 in March?$3.12Mar 10, 16:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin reach $170,000 by December 31, 2026?$9.30Mar 10, 15:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin reach $85,000 in March?$9.00Mar 10, 15:34 UTC
- REWARD$8.80Feb 19, 21:35 UTC
- REWARD$10.76Feb 19, 21:35 UTC
- REDEEMWill Elon Musk post 220-239 tweets from February 13 to February 20, 2026?$155.89Feb 19, 21:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon Musk post 220-239 tweets from February 13 to February 20, 2026?$110.19Feb 18, 13:47 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 42
- Avg trade size
- $19.35
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Feb 14, 13:07 UTC
- Last active
- Jun 4, 00:11 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 16 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".