Cautious-Cinnamon
0x1e0f53bcd3bea9f030ffd222a4ee8a781af093cb
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
33
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-722.01
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 33- OVER
Manchester City FC vs. Salford City FC: O/U 3.5
155 shares @ 73.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 14, 2026$0.00
$-113.15
- YES
Will Manchester City FC win on 2026-03-04?
130 shares @ 71.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 4, 2026$0.00
$-92.30
- YES
Will Liverpool FC win on 2026-03-15?
105 shares @ 77.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 15, 2026$0.00
$-80.85
- YES
Will Manchester United FC win on 2026-02-10?
105 shares @ 57.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 10, 2026$0.00
$-59.85
- YES
Will Manchester City FC win on 2026-03-17?
102 shares @ 68.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 17, 2026$0.00
$-69.36
- YES
Will Bayer 04 Leverkusen win on 2026-03-17?
100 shares @ 7.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 17, 2026$0.00
$-7.25
- OVER
St Mirren FC vs. Rangers FC: O/U 2.5
83 shares @ 57.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 15, 2026$0.00
$-47.31
- UNDER
Aston Villa FC vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg: O/U 3.5
71 shares @ 57.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 29, 2026$0.00
$-40.47
- YES
Will Qarabağ Ağdam FK win on 2026-02-24?
70 shares @ 4.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 24, 2026$0.00
$-3.01
- YES
Will Sunderland AFC win on 2026-03-08?
58 shares @ 65.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 8, 2026$0.00
$-38.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Bayer 04 Leverkusen win on 2026-03-17?$2.25Mar 17, 20:37 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Manchester City FC win on 2026-03-17?$69.36Mar 17, 20:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bayer 04 Leverkusen win on 2026-03-17?$5.00Mar 17, 20:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYSt Mirren FC vs. Rangers FC: O/U 2.5$47.31Mar 15, 09:52 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Liverpool FC win on 2026-03-15?$80.85Mar 15, 09:51 UTC
- REDEEMWill Arsenal FC win on 2026-03-14?$175.00Mar 15, 09:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Arsenal FC win on 2026-03-14?$124.08Mar 12, 21:55 UTC
- TRADESELLWill FC Midtjylland win on 2026-03-12?$14.79Mar 12, 21:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYKRC Genk vs. SC Freiburg: Both Teams to Score$18.90Mar 12, 17:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYLille OSC vs. Aston Villa FC: O/U 2.5$19.76Mar 12, 17:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FC Midtjylland win on 2026-03-12?$3.18Mar 12, 17:39 UTC
- REDEEMFK Bodø/Glimt vs. Sporting CP: O/U 2.5$30.00Mar 12, 17:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Paris Saint-Germain FC vs. Chelsea FC end in a draw?$0.46Mar 11, 20:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Paris Saint-Germain FC vs. Chelsea FC end in a draw?$0.30Mar 11, 20:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Paris Saint-Germain FC vs. Chelsea FC end in a draw?$1.49Mar 11, 20:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Paris Saint-Germain FC vs. Chelsea FC end in a draw?$0.73Mar 11, 20:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYFK Bodø/Glimt vs. Sporting CP: O/U 2.5$18.00Mar 11, 20:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Manchester City FC win on 2026-03-11?$20.24Mar 11, 19:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Sunderland AFC win on 2026-03-08?$38.00Mar 8, 09:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Fulham FC vs. Southampton FC end in a draw?$2.00Mar 8, 09:32 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 37
- Avg trade size
- $25.86
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Feb 16, 08:42 UTC
- Last active
- Mar 17, 20:37 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".