Prudent-Population
0x1e4647c2429fa5a9e95088c883f2c5fa9a965737
Activity score
65/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
83
Open notional
$7.63
Total PnL
$-11.3K
Realised
$-2.8K
Win rate
64%
11 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 83- NO
Israel x Hamas ceasefire cancelled by June 30?
10 shares @ 82.0¢·now 78.0¢·exp Jun 30, 2026$7.63
$-0.39
- LAKERS
Lakers vs. Thunder
5170 shares @ 1.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 3, 2026$0.00
$-86.02
- MAYAR SHERIF
Credit One Charleston Open: Mayar Sherif vs Yue Yuan
4154 shares @ 47.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 7, 2026$0.00
$-2.0K
- ALEX DE MINAUR
Rolex Monte Carlo Masters: Valentin Vacherot vs Alex de Minaur
1746 shares @ 38.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 17, 2026$0.00
$-663.28
- XINYU WANG
La Bisbal: Xinyu Wang vs Alina Charaeva
1100 shares @ 21.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 6, 2026$0.00
$-230.59
- YES
Will Real Madrid CF win on 2026-04-04?
1088 shares @ 16.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 4, 2026$0.00
$-181.99
- SUNS
Rockets vs. Suns
1000 shares @ 57.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 8, 2026$0.00
$-575.00
- MANOJ DHAMNE MANAS
Shymkent 2: Buvaysar Gadamauri vs Manoj Dhamne Manas
1000 shares @ 30.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 10, 2026$0.00
$-302.14
- RAFAEL JODAR
Madrid Open: Jannik Sinner vs Rafael Jodar
900 shares @ 7.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 6, 2026$0.00
$-64.00
- MIRRA ANDREEVA
Porsche Tennis Grand Prix: Elena Rybakina vs Mirra Andreeva
794 shares @ 19.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 25, 2026$0.00
$-154.97
Recent activity
- TRADESELLInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Pedro Martinez vs Jesper de Jong$77.493m ago
- TRADEBUYInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Pedro Martinez vs Jesper de Jong$77.5313m ago
- TRADESELLWill AS Roma win on 2026-05-04?$12.0621m ago
- TRADESELLIran agrees to surrender enriched uranium stockpile by May 31, 2026?$8.0021m ago
- TRADESELLInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Pedro Martinez vs Jesper de Jong$58.5922m ago
- TRADESELLInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Pedro Martinez vs Jesper de Jong$5.5923m ago
- TRADESELLInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Pedro Martinez vs Jesper de Jong$19.5323m ago
- TRADESELLInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Pedro Martinez vs Jesper de Jong$27.1523m ago
- TRADESELLInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Pedro Martinez vs Jesper de Jong$19.3123m ago
- TRADESELLInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Pedro Martinez vs Jesper de Jong$71.1630m ago
- TRADEBUYInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Pedro Martinez vs Jesper de Jong$2.9432m ago
- TRADEBUYInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Pedro Martinez vs Jesper de Jong$2.4835m ago
- TRADEBUYInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Pedro Martinez vs Jesper de Jong$3.6735m ago
- TRADEBUYInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Pedro Martinez vs Jesper de Jong$4.7235m ago
- TRADEBUYInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Pedro Martinez vs Jesper de Jong$0.3336m ago
- TRADEBUYInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Pedro Martinez vs Jesper de Jong$1.0036m ago
- TRADEBUYInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Pedro Martinez vs Jesper de Jong$1.7940m ago
- TRADEBUYInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Pedro Martinez vs Jesper de Jong$28.2345m ago
- TRADEBUYInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Pedro Martinez vs Jesper de Jong$2.7951m ago
- TRADEBUYInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Pedro Martinez vs Jesper de Jong$60.7251m ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 46
- Avg trade size
- $102.83
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 15h ago
- Last active
- 3m ago
- Win rate sample
- 11 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".