0x1fee8f82387795a1b9fc69b80d3897c2be3f1c98
0x1fee8f82387795a1b9fc69b80d3897c2be3f1c98
Wallet digest
Activity score
41/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
3
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-28.98
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- NO
Military action against Iran ends by April 17, 2026?
10000 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 30, 2026$0.00
$-10.00
- JUAN ESTEVEZ
Santa Cruz: Hugo Dellien vs Juan Estevez
9700 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 22, 2026$0.00
$-9.70
- NO
Will the price of Bitcoin be above $64,000 on April 17?
9281 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 17, 2026$0.00
$-9.28
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill the price of Bitcoin be above $64,000 on April 17?$10.00Apr 17, 00:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYSanta Cruz: Hugo Dellien vs Juan Estevez$10.00Apr 16, 03:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYMilitary action against Iran ends by April 17, 2026?$10.00Apr 15, 11:41 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 3
- Avg trade size
- $10.00
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Apr 15, 11:41 UTC
- Last active
- Apr 17, 00:02 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".