Humiliating-Boulder
0x203c9230f87f5fab5fd066d4dc6d5aafb9d99a40
Wallet digest
Activity score
48/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
157
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-29.1K
Realised
$-31.06
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 157- UP
Ethereum Up or Down - August 4, 11PM ET
625 shares @ 40.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Aug 5, 2025$0.00
$-250.00
- UP
Ethereum Up or Down - August 2, 2PM ET
625 shares @ 40.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Aug 2, 2025$0.00
$-250.00
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - August 1, 2PM ET
625 shares @ 40.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Aug 1, 2025$0.00
$-250.00
- UP
Solana Up or Down - August 4, 10AM ET
625 shares @ 40.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Aug 4, 2025$0.00
$-250.00
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - August 1, 1PM ET
625 shares @ 40.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Aug 1, 2025$0.00
$-250.00
- UP
Ethereum Up or Down - August 2, 2AM ET
625 shares @ 40.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Aug 2, 2025$0.00
$-250.00
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - August 5, 12AM ET
625 shares @ 40.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Aug 5, 2025$0.00
$-250.00
- UP
XRP Up or Down - August 4, 10AM ET
625 shares @ 40.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Aug 4, 2025$0.00
$-250.00
- UP
XRP Up or Down - August 4, 11PM ET
625 shares @ 40.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Aug 5, 2025$0.00
$-250.00
- UP
XRP Up or Down - August 3, 5AM ET
625 shares @ 40.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Aug 3, 2025$0.00
$-250.00
Recent activity
- REDEEMXRP Up or Down - February 1, 11:45PM-12:00AM ET$15.75Apr 2, 23:36 UTC
- REDEEMXRP Up or Down - February 1, 6:00PM-6:15PM ET$15.75Apr 2, 23:36 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - February 1, 11:00AM-11:15AM ET$15.75Apr 2, 23:36 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - February 2, 1:30AM-1:45AM ET$15.75Apr 2, 23:36 UTC
- REDEEMEthereum Up or Down - February 1, 6:00PM-6:15PM ET$15.75Apr 2, 23:36 UTC
- REDEEMXRP Up or Down - February 2, 3:00AM-3:15AM ET$15.75Apr 2, 23:36 UTC
- REDEEMXRP Up or Down - February 2, 4:30AM-4:45AM ET$15.75Apr 2, 23:36 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - February 1, 10:15PM-10:30PM ET$15.75Apr 2, 23:36 UTC
- REDEEMSolana Up or Down - February 1, 6:00PM-6:15PM ET$15.75Apr 2, 23:36 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - February 2, 12:15AM-12:30AM ET$15.75Apr 2, 23:36 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - February 1, 2:00PM-2:15PM ET$15.75Apr 2, 23:36 UTC
- REDEEMSolana Up or Down - February 1, 4:45PM-5:00PM ET$15.75Apr 2, 23:36 UTC
- REDEEMXRP Up or Down - February 1, 5:15PM-5:30PM ET$15.75Apr 2, 23:36 UTC
- REDEEMSolana Up or Down - February 1, 2:00PM-2:15PM ET$15.75Apr 2, 23:36 UTC
- REDEEMXRP Up or Down - February 2, 10:00AM-10:15AM ET$15.75Apr 2, 23:36 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - February 1, 11:30PM-11:45PM ET$15.75Apr 2, 23:36 UTC
- REDEEMXRP Up or Down - February 1, 4:15PM-4:30PM ET$15.75Apr 2, 23:36 UTC
- REDEEMEthereum Up or Down - February 2, 2:15AM-2:30AM ET$15.75Apr 2, 23:36 UTC
- REDEEMSolana Up or Down - February 2, 5:00AM-5:15AM ET$15.75Apr 2, 23:36 UTC
- REDEEMSolana Up or Down - February 2, 8:00AM-8:15AM ET$15.75Apr 2, 23:36 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 18
- Avg trade size
- $5.81
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Feb 1, 15:33 UTC
- Last active
- Apr 2, 23:36 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".