Repulsive-Lyre
0x205836944a1bf292351b7868c4781ee65d35cf57
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
19
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-9.1K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 19- OVER
Canadiens vs. Panthers: O/U 6.5
4164 shares @ 48.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 31, 2025$0.00
$-2.0K
- OVER
Hurricanes vs. Penguins: O/U 6.5
4082 shares @ 49.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 31, 2025$0.00
$-2.0K
- OVER
Miami vs. Ohio State: O/U 40.5
2040 shares @ 51.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 1, 2026$0.00
$-1.0K
- WILD
Wild vs. Sharks
1613 shares @ 62.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 31, 2025$0.00
$-1000.00
- TENNESSEE
Tennessee vs. Illinois: 1H Moneyline
909 shares @ 55.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 30, 2025$0.00
$-500.00
- YES
Lighter Airdrop on December 31?
836 shares @ 11.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 31, 2025$0.00
$-100.00
- YES
No airdrop in 2025?
813 shares @ 12.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 31, 2025$0.00
$-100.00
- VANDERBILT
Iowa vs. Vanderbilt
808 shares @ 24.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 31, 2025$0.00
$-200.00
- UNDER
Arsenal FC vs. Aston Villa FC: O/U 2.5
444 shares @ 45.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 30, 2025$0.00
$-200.00
- OVER
Oilers vs. Jets: O/U 6.5
408 shares @ 49.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 30, 2025$0.00
$-200.00
Recent activity
- TRADESELLQueens Park Rangers FC vs. Norwich City FC: Both Teams to Score$512.15Jan 1, 17:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYPreston North End FC vs. Sheffield Wednesday FC: Both Teams to Score$200.00Jan 1, 05:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYQueens Park Rangers FC vs. Norwich City FC: Both Teams to Score$300.00Jan 1, 05:08 UTC
- TRADESELLAuckland FC vs. Newcastle United Jets FC: O/U 2.5$288.96Jan 1, 05:07 UTC
- TRADESELLAuckland FC vs. Newcastle United Jets FC: Both Teams to Score$302.70Jan 1, 05:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYMiami vs. Ohio State: O/U 40.5$1.0KDec 31, 21:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYWild vs. Sharks$1000.00Dec 31, 20:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYIowa vs. Vanderbilt$200.00Dec 31, 19:57 UTC
- TRADESELLNEOM SC vs. Al Ittihad Saudi Club: Both Teams to Score$296.55Dec 31, 16:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYNEOM SC vs. Al Ittihad Saudi Club: Both Teams to Score$13.00Dec 31, 11:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYNEOM SC vs. Al Ittihad Saudi Club: Both Teams to Score$120.00Dec 31, 11:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYNEOM SC vs. Al Ittihad Saudi Club: Both Teams to Score$6.03Dec 31, 11:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYNEOM SC vs. Al Ittihad Saudi Club: Both Teams to Score$6.03Dec 31, 11:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYNEOM SC vs. Al Ittihad Saudi Club: Both Teams to Score$6.03Dec 31, 11:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYNEOM SC vs. Al Ittihad Saudi Club: Both Teams to Score$6.03Dec 31, 11:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYNEOM SC vs. Al Ittihad Saudi Club: Both Teams to Score$6.03Dec 31, 11:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYNEOM SC vs. Al Ittihad Saudi Club: Both Teams to Score$6.03Dec 31, 11:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYNEOM SC vs. Al Ittihad Saudi Club: Both Teams to Score$6.03Dec 31, 11:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYNEOM SC vs. Al Ittihad Saudi Club: Both Teams to Score$6.03Dec 31, 11:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYNEOM SC vs. Al Ittihad Saudi Club: Both Teams to Score$6.03Dec 31, 11:41 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 50
- Avg trade size
- $246.94
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Dec 30, 22:42 UTC
- Last active
- Jan 1, 17:24 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".