0x2080e29836974d3e7c8f70c16699d86ea1dd6d80
0x2080e29836974d3e7c8f70c16699d86ea1dd6d80
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
42
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-3.8K
Realised
$-137.87
Win rate
50%
12 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 42- YES
Will Elon Musk post 115-139 tweets from February 28 to March 2, 2026?
3962 shares @ 4.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 2, 2026$0.00
$-180.71
- NO
Will Londrina EC vs. Cuiabá EC end in a draw?
1541 shares @ 6.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 1, 2026$0.00
$-101.00
- YES
Will Elon Musk post 65-89 tweets from February 28 to March 2, 2026?
1236 shares @ 8.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 2, 2026$0.00
$-109.12
- UNDER
CD Tondela vs. Gil Vicente FC: O/U 3.5
883 shares @ 82.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 13, 2026$0.00
$-732.37
- OVER
Real Valladolid CF vs. SD Eibar: O/U 4.5
600 shares @ 2.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 13, 2026$0.00
$-12.00
- YES
Will Elon Musk post 360-379 tweets from February 10 to February 17, 2026?
522 shares @ 8.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 17, 2026$0.00
$-42.31
- NO
Will the price of Bitcoin be above $76,000 on April 28?
471 shares @ 20.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 28, 2026$0.00
$-94.24
- YES
Will Elon Musk post 165-189 tweets from February 12 to February 14, 2026?
443 shares @ 10.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 14, 2026$0.00
$-44.30
- YES
Will Elon Musk post 380-399 tweets from February 10 to February 17, 2026?
428 shares @ 9.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 17, 2026$0.00
$-40.63
- YES
Will Elon Musk post 340-359 tweets from February 10 to February 17, 2026?
385 shares @ 8.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 17, 2026$0.00
$-34.38
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYSport Lisboa e Benfica vs. SC Braga: O/U 3.5$67.08May 11, 21:07 UTC
- TRADESELLSport Lisboa e Benfica vs. SC Braga: O/U 2.5$69.42May 11, 21:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYSport Lisboa e Benfica vs. SC Braga: O/U 2.5$68.21May 11, 20:57 UTC
- TRADESELLSD Huesca vs. Real Sociedad de Fútbol B: O/U 3.5$9.92May 11, 20:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYSD Huesca vs. Real Sociedad de Fútbol B: O/U 2.5$89.13May 11, 20:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYSD Huesca vs. Real Sociedad de Fútbol B: O/U 2.5$31.87May 11, 20:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYSD Huesca vs. Real Sociedad de Fútbol B: O/U 2.5$90.06May 11, 20:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYSD Huesca vs. Real Sociedad de Fútbol B: O/U 3.5$7.52May 11, 19:10 UTC
- TRADESELLRanders FC vs. Odense BK: O/U 4.5$236.03May 11, 19:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYRanders FC vs. Odense BK: O/U 4.5$112.31May 11, 18:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYRanders FC vs. Odense BK: O/U 4.5$102.18May 11, 18:04 UTC
- TRADESELLFC Metaloglobus București vs. FC Hermannstadt: O/U 4.5$103.26May 11, 18:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Metaloglobus București vs. FC Hermannstadt: O/U 4.5$71.53May 11, 16:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Metaloglobus București vs. FC Hermannstadt: O/U 4.5$19.85May 11, 16:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Metaloglobus București vs. FC Hermannstadt: O/U 3.5$94.05May 11, 16:32 UTC
- REDEEMCF Pachuca vs. Deportivo Toluca FC: O/U 4.5$157.11May 11, 08:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYCF Pachuca vs. Deportivo Toluca FC: O/U 4.5$15.83May 11, 00:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYCF Pachuca vs. Deportivo Toluca FC: O/U 4.5$15.20May 11, 00:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYCF Pachuca vs. Deportivo Toluca FC: O/U 4.5$100.00May 11, 00:14 UTC
- TRADESELLFC Südtirol vs. SS Juve Stabia: O/U 4.5$104.80May 8, 20:30 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Wallet edge sanity
Needs review
31/100Useful as a watchlist input, but the edge claim still needs resolved history, cost, and source checks.
Many positions were entered near obvious prices, which can inflate win rate while hiding tail risk.
Required before treating wallet flow as useful
50% win rate over 12 closed markets.
A wallet trade is not useful unless a later follower could still enter after spread, slippage, and latency.
Large positions need enough depth to exit; mark-to-market PnL is not cash.
The trade still needs source, expiry, dispute, and settlement checks at the market level.
Leaderboards surface visible winners; losing or abandoned wallets disappear from attention.
Wallet intelligence filter
Watch only
14/100Wallet flow is useful for attention, but missing/review stages stop it from becoming paper attribution.
48 live trades, 0 ledger trades, copy-risk 45/100.
12 closed markets. Enough to inspect, not enough to trust.
No market-level spread or simulated execution cost is attached yet.
No source/expiry/dispute risk context is attached yet.
No market liquidity/depth context is attached yet.
No delayed-entry simulation is attached yet.
No paper receipts attribute this wallet signal to later outcomes yet.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 48
- Avg trade size
- $70.73
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 6, 08:41 UTC
- Last active
- May 11, 21:07 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 12 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read; copy-risk is inverted so green means lower risk of over-reading the wallet.