Meager-Lab
0x2203f561b4febb170b8e328cddf1c03a696a7e9f
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
14
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-103.49
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 14- YES
Will SS Lazio win on 2026-04-04?
80 shares @ 42.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 4, 2026$0.00
$-34.40
- YES
Will FC Porto win on 2026-04-09?
56 shares @ 44.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 9, 2026$0.00
$-24.58
- YES
Exact Score: Bologna FC 1909 0 - 1 Aston Villa FC?
52 shares @ 13.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 9, 2026$0.00
$-6.82
- YES
Exact Score: FC Porto 1 - 0 Nottingham Forest FC?
38 shares @ 18.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 9, 2026$0.00
$-6.83
- YES
Will Liverpool FC win on 2026-04-04?
33 shares @ 3.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 4, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- YES
Will Club Atlético de Madrid win on 2026-04-04?
28 shares @ 7.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 4, 2026$0.00
$-1.94
- YES
Will Real Madrid CF win on 2026-04-04?
27 shares @ 63.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 4, 2026$0.00
$-17.19
- YES
Will Chelsea FC vs. Manchester United FC end in a draw?
17 shares @ 29.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 18, 2026$0.00
$-4.89
- YES
Exact Score: FC Porto 2 - 0 Nottingham Forest FC?
12 shares @ 8.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 9, 2026$0.00
$-0.97
- YES
Exact Score: Bologna FC 1909 0 - 0 Aston Villa FC?
10 shares @ 10.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 9, 2026$0.00
$-0.97
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Chelsea FC vs. Manchester United FC end in a draw?$5.00Apr 18, 20:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: FC Porto 2 - 1 Nottingham Forest FC?$1.00Apr 9, 16:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FC Porto win on 2026-04-09?$25.00Apr 9, 16:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: Bologna FC 1909 1 - 1 Aston Villa FC?$1.00Apr 9, 16:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: Bologna FC 1909 0 - 0 Aston Villa FC?$1.00Apr 9, 16:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: FC Porto 0 - 0 Nottingham Forest FC?$1.00Apr 9, 16:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: FC Porto 2 - 0 Nottingham Forest FC?$1.00Apr 9, 16:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: FC Porto 1 - 0 Nottingham Forest FC?$7.00Apr 9, 16:00 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Lille OSC win on 2026-04-12?$14.73Apr 9, 14:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: Bologna FC 1909 0 - 1 Aston Villa FC?$7.00Apr 9, 14:16 UTC
- REDEEMExact Score: Paris Saint-Germain FC 2 - 0 Liverpool FC?$10.81Apr 9, 12:50 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Paris Saint-Germain FC win on 2026-04-08?$74.33Apr 8, 20:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: Paris Saint-Germain FC 2 - 0 Liverpool FC?$1.00Apr 8, 18:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: Paris Saint-Germain FC 2 - 1 Liverpool FC?$1.00Apr 8, 18:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Paris Saint-Germain FC win on 2026-04-08?$40.00Apr 8, 18:37 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Galatasaray SK win on 2026-04-08?$16.60Apr 7, 21:38 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Real Madrid CF vs. FC Bayern München end in a draw?$2.76Apr 7, 20:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Real Madrid CF vs. FC Bayern München end in a draw?$5.00Apr 7, 20:36 UTC
- TRADESELLReal Madrid CF vs. FC Bayern München: Both Teams to Score$51.20Apr 7, 20:35 UTC
- TRADESELLSporting CP vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 2.5$5.65Apr 7, 19:23 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 42
- Avg trade size
- $16.42
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Apr 4, 12:33 UTC
- Last active
- Apr 18, 20:17 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".