Solid-Sparerib
0x2217a1deca84b840684c46e4bee8b16ef139d84c
Wallet digest
Activity score
45/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
3
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-29.47
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- TRADESELLWill Italy qualify for the 2026 FIFA World Cup?$36.99Mar 31, 21:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Italy qualify for the 2026 FIFA World Cup?$15.61Mar 31, 20:40 UTC
- TRADESELLVirtus Bologna vs. Paris Basketball$15.61Mar 31, 20:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill England win on 2026-03-31?$10.30Mar 31, 19:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYCzechia vs. Denmark: O/U 4.5$5.53Mar 31, 19:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYVirtus Bologna vs. Paris Basketball$7.00Mar 31, 18:26 UTC
- TRADESELLBitcoin Up or Down - March 31, 2:20PM-2:25PM ET$12.44Mar 31, 18:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - March 31, 2:20PM-2:25PM ET$5.00Mar 31, 18:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Denmark win on 2026-03-31?$14.00Mar 31, 18:20 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 9
- Avg trade size
- $13.61
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Mar 31, 18:20 UTC
- Last active
- Mar 31, 21:35 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".