Insidious-Accord
0x2218b0f87d361c4b09c515bf7a8ab6bc208196b9
Wallet digest
Activity score
43/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-12.77
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYEthena token FDV between 7.5b and 10b one day after launch?$12.77Apr 1, 09:31 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Adam Schiff get first place in the California Senate Primary?$12.77Apr 1, 09:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Adam Schiff get first place in the California Senate Primary?$10.91Mar 12, 23:25 UTC
- REDEEMWill 2024 have the hottest February on record?$10.91Mar 12, 23:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill 2024 have the hottest February on record?$10.04Mar 4, 17:08 UTC
- REDEEMKate Middleton appearance by Sunday?$10.04Mar 4, 17:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYKate Middleton appearance by Sunday?$10.00Mar 3, 17:43 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 5
- Avg trade size
- $11.30
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Mar 3, 17:43 UTC
- Last active
- Apr 1, 09:31 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".