Unhealthy-Rate
0x22281a00798dbfa824af2439918d3c7614c446c2
Wallet digest
Activity score
79/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$75.53
Total PnL
$0.08
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Amazon be the second-largest company in the world by market cap on June 30?$75.45Jun 21, 12:07 UTC
- REDEEMWill Ethereum dip to $1,800 May 18-24?$75.50Jun 21, 12:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum dip to $1,800 May 18-24?$75.43May 24, 21:14 UTC
- REDEEMWill XRP reach $2.40 in April?$75.45May 24, 21:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill XRP reach $2.40 in April?$75.31Apr 24, 18:46 UTC
- REDEEMWill Saudi Aramco be the second-largest company in the world by market cap on March 31?$74.51Apr 24, 18:46 UTC
- REWARD$0.79Mar 30, 19:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Saudi Aramco be the second-largest company in the world by market cap on March 31?$74.44Mar 18, 19:22 UTC
- REDEEMWill Gold (GC) hit (HIGH) $10,000 by end of February?$74.07Mar 18, 19:20 UTC
- REWARD$0.23Mar 1, 00:16 UTC
- REWARD$0.74Mar 1, 00:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Gold (GC) hit (HIGH) $10,000 by end of February?$74.00Feb 25, 04:54 UTC
- REDEEMWill NVIDIA dip to $108 in January?$77.23Feb 25, 04:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill NVIDIA dip to $108 in January?$77.08Jan 23, 07:50 UTC
- REDEEMWill Hyperliquid hit $70 in 2025?$30.30Jan 23, 07:49 UTC
- REDEEMWill NVIDIA (NVDA) hit $245 before 2026??$46.78Jan 23, 07:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill NVIDIA (NVDA) hit $245 before 2026??$46.69Dec 8, 21:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hyperliquid hit $70 in 2025?$29.94Dec 8, 21:25 UTC
- REDEEMWill Palantir reach $249 in November?$23.62Dec 8, 21:23 UTC
- REDEEMWill Google dip to $175 in November?$53.00Dec 8, 21:23 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Wallet edge sanity
Do not mirror
0/100Treat this wallet as noise/context only until resolved history, copy-risk, and liquidity checks improve.
Win rate is hidden until at least 3 closed markets exist for this wallet.
Large size, concentration, or thin history makes this wallet unsafe to imitate.
Required before treating wallet flow as useful
Only 0 closed markets; headline win rate is intentionally hidden.
A wallet trade is not useful unless a later follower could still enter after spread, slippage, and latency.
Large positions need enough depth to exit; mark-to-market PnL is not cash.
The trade still needs source, expiry, dispute, and settlement checks at the market level.
Leaderboards surface visible winners; losing or abandoned wallets disappear from attention.
Wallet intelligence filter
Blocked
0/100Wallet flow is blocked as an intelligence signal until hard failures are fixed.
Wallet activity exists, but copy-risk is too high for interpretation.
Too few closed markets. Do not infer edge from open PnL or leaderboard rank.
No market-level spread or simulated execution cost is attached yet.
No source/expiry/dispute risk context is attached yet.
No market liquidity/depth context is attached yet.
No delayed-entry simulation is attached yet.
No paper receipts attribute this wallet signal to later outcomes yet.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 10
- Avg trade size
- $60.45
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Oct 17, 15:27 UTC
- Last active
- Jun 21, 12:07 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read; copy-risk is inverted so green means lower risk of over-reading the wallet.