Vapid-Statue
0x248838777bec7f0f470fe6a86eb11b0255aea967
Wallet digest
Activity score
44/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-377.40
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- REDEEMWill the price of XRP be between $1.70 and $1.80 on November 26?$3.93Jan 26, 07:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Penguins (-1.5)$140.60Jan 25, 08:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Penguins (-1.5)$155.40Jan 25, 08:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Penguins (-1.5)$81.40Jan 25, 08:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the price of XRP be between $1.70 and $1.80 on November 26?$3.50Nov 21, 07:49 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Meta (META) close above $740 end of November?$98.01Nov 21, 07:47 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Meta (META) close above $740 end of November?$1.6KNov 21, 07:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Meta (META) close above $740 end of November?$1.7KNov 21, 07:30 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 7
- Avg trade size
- $543.77
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Nov 21, 07:30 UTC
- Last active
- Jan 26, 07:25 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".