Yawning-Butane
0x25de5264ee373fbe918a6f01af4a71ea77f4ec0e
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
21
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-927.13
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 21- YES
Elche CF vs. CA Osasuna: Both Teams to Score
167 shares @ 54.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 13, 2026$0.00
$-90.38
- NO
Will Club Atlético de Madrid win on 2026-02-12?
149 shares @ 67.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 12, 2026$0.00
$-100.00
- YES
FC St. Pauli 1910 vs. Hamburger SV: Both Teams to Score
129 shares @ 46.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 23, 2026$0.00
$-59.34
- YES
Will CD Universidad Católica win on 2026-02-12?
112 shares @ 68.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 13, 2026$0.00
$-76.00
- NO
Will Levante UD win on 2026-01-23?
105 shares @ 58.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 23, 2026$0.00
$-60.90
- NO
US government shutdown Saturday?
100 shares @ 20.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 31, 2026$0.00
$-20.00
- OVER
SV Werder Bremen vs. TSG 1899 Hoffenheim: O/U 3.5
100 shares @ 36.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 10, 2026$0.00
$-36.00
- YES
Will Paddy Pimblett win by KO or TKO?
100 shares @ 22.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 25, 2026$0.00
$-22.00
- OVER
Seahawks vs. Patriots: O/U 45.5
89 shares @ 48.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 8, 2026$0.00
$-42.72
- YES
Lille OSC vs. SC Freiburg: Both Teams to Score
86 shares @ 55.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 29, 2026$0.00
$-47.30
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYElche CF vs. CA Osasuna: Both Teams to Score$90.38Feb 13, 15:55 UTC
- REDEEMBrentford FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 1.5$89.74Feb 13, 00:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill CD Universidad Católica win on 2026-02-12?$76.00Feb 12, 16:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYBrentford FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 1.5$70.00Feb 12, 16:16 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Club Atlético de Madrid win on 2026-02-12?$100.00Feb 12, 16:15 UTC
- REDEEMWill Brighton & Hove Albion FC win on 2026-02-11?$65.33Feb 12, 01:20 UTC
- REDEEMWill Manchester City FC win on 2026-02-11?$69.44Feb 12, 01:20 UTC
- REDEEMBologna FC 1909 vs. SS Lazio: O/U 1.5$110.29Feb 12, 00:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Manchester City FC win on 2026-02-11?$50.00Feb 11, 17:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Nottingham Forest FC win on 2026-02-11?$40.00Feb 11, 17:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYBologna FC 1909 vs. SS Lazio: O/U 1.5$75.00Feb 11, 17:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Brighton & Hove Albion FC win on 2026-02-11?$49.00Feb 11, 17:09 UTC
- REDEEMWill Como 1907 win on 2026-02-10?$75.00Feb 11, 17:07 UTC
- REDEEMWill Hertha BSC win on 2026-02-10?$75.00Feb 11, 01:14 UTC
- REDEEMTottenham Hotspur FC vs. Newcastle United FC: Both Teams to Score$65.00Feb 11, 00:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYTottenham Hotspur FC vs. Newcastle United FC: Both Teams to Score$40.30Feb 10, 16:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Chelsea FC win on 2026-02-10?$36.40Feb 10, 16:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Como 1907 win on 2026-02-10?$49.50Feb 10, 16:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hertha BSC win on 2026-02-10?$51.75Feb 10, 16:40 UTC
- REDEEMFC Porto vs. Sporting CP: Both Teams to Score$178.00Feb 10, 01:14 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 33
- Avg trade size
- $47.17
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jan 23, 16:14 UTC
- Last active
- Feb 13, 15:55 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".