Mortified-Spoon
0x2662519eac749565ca9067c4ff78fad1b4393f84
Activity score
75/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
10
Open notional
$688.96
Total PnL
$-2.2K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- YELLOW SUBMARINE
Dota 2: Yellow Submarine vs South America Rejects (BO3) - 1win Essence Group A
692 shares @ 49.3¢·now 99.5¢·exp May 2, 2026$688.81
$347.76
- 100 THIEVES
Counter-Strike: illwill vs 100 Thieves - Map 1 Winner
300 shares @ 65.0¢·now 0.1¢·exp May 2, 2026$0.15
$-194.85
- NIGMA GALAXY
Dota 2: Nigma Galaxy vs South America Rejects (BO5) - DreamLeague Division 2 Playoffs
1752 shares @ 14.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 1, 2026$0.00
$-250.00
- FOKUS
Counter-Strike: Gentle Mates vs FOKUS (BO3) - Stake Ranked Episode 2: Closed Qualifier Playoffs
1096 shares @ 44.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 2, 2026$0.00
$-487.60
- G2
Counter-Strike: G2 vs FaZe (BO3) - BLAST Rivals Playoffs
705 shares @ 71.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 2, 2026$0.00
$-500.55
- NIGMA GALAXY
Dota 2: Nigma Galaxy vs South America Rejects - Game 3 Winner
483 shares @ 51.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 1, 2026$0.00
$-250.00
- ASTRALIS
Counter-Strike: Astralis vs GamerLegion (BO3) - BLAST Rivals Playoffs
365 shares @ 70.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 2, 2026$0.00
$-259.00
- VICI GAMING
Dota 2: Vici Gaming vs Team Resilience - Game 1 Winner
338 shares @ 74.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 1, 2026$0.00
$-250.00
- FURIA
Counter-Strike: FURIA vs GamerLegion - Map 2 Winner
325 shares @ 77.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 30, 2026$0.00
$-250.00
- ASTRALIS
Counter-Strike: Astralis vs GamerLegion - Map 1 Winner
175 shares @ 69.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 2, 2026$0.00
$-121.08
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Yellow Submarine vs South America Rejects (BO3) - 1win Essence Group A$111.6235m ago
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Yellow Submarine vs South America Rejects (BO3) - 1win Essence Group A$234.6236m ago
- TRADESELLDota 2: Yellow Submarine vs South America Rejects - Game 1 Winner$329.651h ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: illwill vs 100 Thieves - Map 1 Winner$32.502h ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: illwill vs 100 Thieves - Map 1 Winner$54.272h ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: illwill vs 100 Thieves - Map 1 Winner$108.222h ago
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Yellow Submarine vs South America Rejects - Game 1 Winner$22.743h ago
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Yellow Submarine vs South America Rejects - Game 1 Winner$213.393h ago
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Yellow Submarine vs South America Rejects - Game 1 Winner$1.473h ago
- TRADESELLDota 2: Vici Gaming vs Yakult Brothers (BO3) - ACL X ESL Challenger China Playoffs$449.543h ago
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Vici Gaming vs Yakult Brothers (BO3) - ACL X ESL Challenger China Playoffs$311.504h ago
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Vici Gaming vs Yakult Brothers (BO3) - ACL X ESL Challenger China Playoffs$3.504h ago
- REDEEMDota 2: Yakult Brothers vs Cloud Dawning - Game 1 Winner$316.617h ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Gentle Mates vs FOKUS (BO3) - Stake Ranked Episode 2: Closed Qualifier Playoffs$237.6011h ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Gentle Mates vs FOKUS (BO3) - Stake Ranked Episode 2: Closed Qualifier Playoffs$254.1211h ago
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Yakult Brothers vs Cloud Dawning - Game 1 Winner$251.5813h ago
- MAKER_REBATE$3.0117h ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Astralis vs GamerLegion - Map 1 Winner$122.2018h ago
- REWARD$2.0118h ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Astralis vs GamerLegion (BO3) - BLAST Rivals Playoffs$261.2618h ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 44
- Avg trade size
- $152.43
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 2d ago
- Last active
- 35m ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".