Vital-Booklet
0x27ec4f120f26b84ba947464e32b88327b2454bbc
Wallet digest
Activity score
48/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
8
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-1.1K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- YES
Will FSV Mainz 05 vs. Borussia Mönchengladbach end in a draw?
1786 shares @ 28.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 5, 2025$0.00
$-500.00
- YES
Will FC Internazionale Milano vs. Como 1907 end in a draw?
1250 shares @ 24.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 6, 2025$0.00
$-300.00
- YES
Will Hamburger SV vs. Werder Bremen end in a draw?
389 shares @ 28.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 7, 2025$0.00
$-109.00
- YES
Will Athletic Club vs. Atletico Madrid end in a draw?
360 shares @ 30.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 6, 2025$0.00
$-108.00
- YES
Will Leeds United vs. Aston Villa end in a draw?
100 shares @ 29.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 23, 2025$0.00
$-29.00
- YES
Will Espanyol vs. Sevilla end in a draw?
38 shares @ 29.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 24, 2025$0.00
$-11.00
- YES
Will Manchester United vs. Everton end in a draw?
35 shares @ 26.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 24, 2025$0.00
$-9.00
- YES
Will Torino FC vs. Como 1907 end in a draw?
29 shares @ 31.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 24, 2025$0.00
$-9.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Hamburger SV vs. Werder Bremen end in a draw?$109.00Dec 7, 12:52 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Athletic Club vs. Atletico Madrid end in a draw?$108.00Dec 6, 18:08 UTC
- TRADESELLWill RB Leipzig vs. Eintracht Frankfurt end in a draw?$77.29Dec 6, 18:06 UTC
- TRADESELLWill RB Leipzig vs. Eintracht Frankfurt end in a draw?$2.09Dec 6, 18:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill RB Leipzig vs. Eintracht Frankfurt end in a draw?$300.00Dec 6, 16:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FC Internazionale Milano vs. Como 1907 end in a draw?$300.00Dec 6, 15:59 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Everton vs. Nottingham Forest end in a draw?$40.00Dec 6, 15:58 UTC
- TRADESELLWill 1. FC Köln vs. FC St. Pauli end in a draw?$171.43Dec 6, 15:57 UTC
- TRADESELLWill US Sassuolo Calcio vs. ACF Fiorentina end in a draw?$154.84Dec 6, 15:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Everton vs. Nottingham Forest end in a draw?$200.00Dec 6, 13:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill US Sassuolo Calcio vs. ACF Fiorentina end in a draw?$200.00Dec 6, 13:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill 1. FC Köln vs. FC St. Pauli end in a draw?$300.00Dec 6, 13:05 UTC
- REDEEMWill Real Oviedo vs. Mallorca end in a draw?$937.50Dec 6, 12:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FSV Mainz 05 vs. Borussia Mönchengladbach end in a draw?$500.00Dec 5, 13:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Real Oviedo vs. Mallorca end in a draw?$300.00Dec 5, 13:23 UTC
- REDEEMWill Manchester United vs. West Ham end in a draw?$825.00Dec 5, 05:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Manchester United vs. West Ham end in a draw?$165.00Dec 4, 09:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Espanyol vs. Sevilla end in a draw?$11.00Nov 24, 13:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Torino FC vs. Como 1907 end in a draw?$9.00Nov 24, 13:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Manchester United vs. Everton end in a draw?$9.00Nov 24, 13:50 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 19
- Avg trade size
- $157.14
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Nov 23, 12:53 UTC
- Last active
- Dec 7, 12:52 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".