Considerate-Flatboat
0x281d37238d91bd7fb22e322f94667af57b8f6adf
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
6
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-872.71
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- OG
Counter-Strike: Inner Circle Esports vs OG (BO1) - BC Game Masters Championship Group D
900 shares @ 58.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 24, 2026$0.00
$-525.23
- PARIVISION
Counter-Strike: PARIVISION vs Vitality - Map 2 Winner
453 shares @ 25.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 23, 2026$0.00
$-113.30
- FNATIC
Counter-Strike: fnatic vs MOUZ NXT (BO1) - BC Game Masters Championship Group A
231 shares @ 59.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 24, 2026$0.00
$-138.30
- PASSION UA
Counter-Strike: Passion UA vs BASEMENT BOYS (BO1) - BC Game Masters Championship Group B
98 shares @ 81.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 24, 2026$0.00
$-79.38
- JAKUB MENSIK
Miami Open: Frances Tiafoe vs Jakub Mensik
15 shares @ 58.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 30, 2026$0.00
$-8.70
- TAYLOR FRITZ
Miami Open: Jiri Lehecka vs Taylor Fritz
12 shares @ 65.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 31, 2026$0.00
$-7.80
Recent activity
- REDEEMCounter-Strike: GamerLegion vs Natus Vincere - Map 3 Winner$3.0KMay 18, 09:07 UTC
- MAKER_REBATE$4.51May 18, 00:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: GamerLegion vs Natus Vincere - Map 3 Winner$86.55May 17, 20:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: GamerLegion vs Natus Vincere - Map 3 Winner$96.23May 17, 20:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: GamerLegion vs Natus Vincere - Map 3 Winner$10.44May 17, 20:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: GamerLegion vs Natus Vincere - Map 3 Winner$7.87May 17, 20:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: GamerLegion vs Natus Vincere - Map 3 Winner$7.09May 17, 20:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: GamerLegion vs Natus Vincere - Map 3 Winner$33.83May 17, 20:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: GamerLegion vs Natus Vincere - Map 3 Winner$451.06May 17, 20:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: GamerLegion vs Natus Vincere - Map 3 Winner$110.77May 17, 20:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: GamerLegion vs Natus Vincere - Map 3 Winner$106.00May 17, 20:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: GamerLegion vs Natus Vincere - Map 3 Winner$2.65May 17, 20:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: GamerLegion vs Natus Vincere - Map 3 Winner$2.65May 17, 20:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: GamerLegion vs Natus Vincere - Map 3 Winner$37.56May 17, 20:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: GamerLegion vs Natus Vincere - Map 3 Winner$112.77May 17, 20:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: GamerLegion vs Natus Vincere - Map 3 Winner$33.83May 17, 20:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: GamerLegion vs Natus Vincere - Map 3 Winner$5.83May 17, 20:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: GamerLegion vs Natus Vincere - Map 3 Winner$132.50May 17, 20:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: GamerLegion vs Natus Vincere - Map 3 Winner$11.28May 17, 20:54 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: GamerLegion vs Natus Vincere - Map 3 Winner$30.47May 17, 20:54 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 41
- Avg trade size
- $115.55
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Mar 24, 13:40 UTC
- Last active
- May 18, 09:07 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".