0x28d6014fef7069f60f240a828a8ba65c30858c84
0x28d6014fef7069f60f240a828a8ba65c30858c84
Wallet digest
Activity score
53/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
23
Open notional
$6.67
Total PnL
$-67.04
Realised
$-0.38
Win rate
50%
8 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 23- KARMINE CORP
LoL: SK Gaming vs Karmine Corp (BO1) - LEC Versus Regular Season
3 shares @ 76.5¢·now 100.0¢·exp Jan 25, 2026$2.80
$0.66
- NO
Will Brentford FC vs. AFC Bournemouth end in a draw?
3 shares @ 0.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Dec 27, 2025$2.66
$2.66
- GIANTX
LoL: Los Ratones vs GIANTX (BO1) - LEC Versus Regular Season
1 shares @ 88.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Jan 24, 2026$1.22
$0.15
- FULL SENSE
Valorant: DRX vs FULL SENSE - Map 1 Winner
109 shares @ 1.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 24, 2026$0.00
$-2.11
- VITALITY
Counter-Strike: Vitality vs Team Falcons (BO3) - BLAST Bounty Playoffs
31 shares @ 46.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 24, 2026$0.00
$-14.36
- TOP ESPORTS
LoL: Top Esports vs Anyone's Legend - Game 1 Winner
29 shares @ 11.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 24, 2026$0.00
$-3.18
- DN FREECS
LoL: Hanwha Life Esports vs DN Freecs (BO3) - LCK Cup Group Stage
26 shares @ 20.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 24, 2026$0.00
$-5.33
- FURIA
Counter-Strike: PARIVISION vs FURIA (BO3) - BLAST Bounty Playoffs
21 shares @ 28.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 25, 2026$0.00
$-6.00
- NO
Epstein blackmail evidence released by March 31?
21 shares @ 0.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 31, 2026$0.00
$0.00
- NO
Will Liverpool FC win on 2026-01-31?
16 shares @ 41.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 31, 2026$0.00
$-6.42
Recent activity
- REDEEMLoL: Top Esports vs Anyone's Legend - Game 2 Winner$0.00Jun 26, 01:06 UTC
- REDEEMGames Total: O/U 2.5$0.00Jun 26, 01:06 UTC
- REDEEMGames Total: O/U 2.5$0.51Jun 26, 01:06 UTC
- REDEEMValorant: EDward Gaming vs TYLOO - Map 1 Winner$1.55Jun 26, 01:02 UTC
- REDEEMGames Total: O/U 2.5$1.76Jun 26, 01:02 UTC
- REDEEMLoL: Team Vitality vs Karmine Corp (BO1) - LEC Versus Regular Season$2.00Jun 26, 01:02 UTC
- REDEEMLoL: Weibo Gaming vs JD Gaming (BO3) - LPL Group Ascend$2.02Jun 26, 01:02 UTC
- REDEEMGames Total: O/U 2.5$2.06Jun 26, 01:02 UTC
- REDEEMWill Wolverhampton Wanderers FC win on 2025-12-27?$2.24Jun 26, 01:02 UTC
- REDEEMWill Torino FC vs. Cagliari Calcio end in a draw?$2.50Jun 26, 01:02 UTC
- REDEEMWill Brentford FC vs. AFC Bournemouth end in a draw?$0.00Jun 26, 01:02 UTC
- REDEEMLiverpool FC vs. Wolverhampton Wanderers FC: O/U 2.5$3.74Jun 26, 01:01 UTC
- REDEEMValorant: XLG Gaming vs Wolves Esports (BO3) - VCT China Kickoff Playoffs$4.00Jun 26, 01:01 UTC
- REDEEMCounter-Strike: Vitality vs Team Falcons - Map 1 Winner$4.11Jun 26, 01:01 UTC
- REDEEMValorant: T1 vs Nongshim RedForce (BO3) - VCT Pacific Kickoff Playoffs$4.34Jun 26, 01:01 UTC
- REDEEMWill Brentford FC win on 2025-12-27?$4.47Jun 26, 01:01 UTC
- REDEEMWill Torino FC win on 2025-12-27?$4.61Jun 26, 01:00 UTC
- REDEEMUFC 324: Perez vs. Johnson (Flyweight, Prelims)$4.78Jun 26, 01:00 UTC
- REDEEMUFC 324: Krylov vs. Bukauskas (Light Heavyweight, Prelims)$4.80Jun 26, 01:00 UTC
- REDEEMRams vs. Seahawks$4.82Jun 26, 01:00 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Wallet edge sanity
Needs review
27/100Useful as a watchlist input, but the edge claim still needs resolved history, cost, and source checks.
Closed-market sample is still too small to treat the win rate as durable.
Use this wallet as an attention signal only, then verify liquidity and resolution risk.
Required before treating wallet flow as useful
50% win rate over 8 closed markets.
A wallet trade is not useful unless a later follower could still enter after spread, slippage, and latency.
Large positions need enough depth to exit; mark-to-market PnL is not cash.
The trade still needs source, expiry, dispute, and settlement checks at the market level.
Leaderboards surface visible winners; losing or abandoned wallets disappear from attention.
Wallet intelligence filter
Watch only
14/100Wallet flow is useful for attention, but missing/review stages stop it from becoming paper attribution.
7 live trades, 0 ledger trades, copy-risk 53/100.
8 closed markets. Enough to inspect, not enough to trust.
No market-level spread or simulated execution cost is attached yet.
No source/expiry/dispute risk context is attached yet.
No market liquidity/depth context is attached yet.
No delayed-entry simulation is attached yet.
No paper receipts attribute this wallet signal to later outcomes yet.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 7
- Avg trade size
- $0.91
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jan 31, 19:47 UTC
- Last active
- Jun 26, 01:06 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 8 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read; copy-risk is inverted so green means lower risk of over-reading the wallet.