0x2966fe431af4f5d1aa4e0ef3f6bcc24053c0d642
0x2966fe431af4f5d1aa4e0ef3f6bcc24053c0d642
Wallet digest
Activity score
49/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
48
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-303.76
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 48- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - March 26, 10:10PM-10:15PM ET
500 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 27, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - March 26, 8:35PM-8:40PM ET
500 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 27, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - March 26, 8:55PM-9:00PM ET
500 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 27, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - March 26, 8:50PM-8:55PM ET
500 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 27, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - March 26, 8:45PM-8:50PM ET
500 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 27, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - March 26, 9:55PM-10:00PM ET
500 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 27, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - March 26, 10:35PM-10:40PM ET
500 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 27, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - March 26, 10:15PM-10:20PM ET
500 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 27, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - March 26, 9:10PM-9:15PM ET
500 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 27, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - March 26, 10:25PM-10:30PM ET
500 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 27, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
Recent activity
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - March 31, 1:05PM-1:10PM ET$5.93Apr 9, 08:13 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - March 31, 1:30PM-1:35PM ET$6.06Apr 9, 08:12 UTC
- REDEEMWill Bitcoin reach $85,000 in March?$10.11Apr 9, 08:12 UTC
- REDEEMWill Bitcoin reach $80,000 in March?$59.58Apr 9, 08:12 UTC
- REDEEMWill Bitcoin dip to $60,000 in March?$96.19Apr 9, 08:12 UTC
- REDEEMWill Bitcoin dip to $55,000 in March?$323.60Apr 9, 08:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - March 31, 1:50PM-1:55PM ET$4.76Mar 31, 17:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - March 31, 1:30PM-1:35PM ET$4.80Mar 31, 17:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - March 31, 1:05PM-1:10PM ET$4.98Mar 31, 17:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - March 31, 12:35PM-12:40PM ET$4.50Mar 31, 16:36 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - March 27, 3:00PM-3:15PM ET$4.95Mar 31, 14:48 UTC
- REDEEMWill Bitcoin dip to $70,000 on March 18?$4.97Mar 31, 14:48 UTC
- REDEEMWill the price of Bitcoin be above $76,000 on March 18?$5.00Mar 31, 14:48 UTC
- REDEEMWill Bitcoin dip to $65,000 in March?$5.00Mar 31, 14:48 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - March 27, 6:30PM-6:45PM ET$6.82Mar 31, 14:47 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - March 27, 4:00PM-4:15PM ET$6.94Mar 31, 14:47 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - March 27, 6:45PM-7:00PM ET$10.17Mar 31, 14:47 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - March 27, 4:10AM-4:15AM ET$10.84Mar 31, 14:47 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - March 27, 12:15PM-12:30PM ET$12.82Mar 31, 14:47 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - March 27, 6:15PM-6:30PM ET$12.86Mar 31, 14:47 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 26
- Avg trade size
- $2.49
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Mar 27, 19:40 UTC
- Last active
- Apr 9, 08:13 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".